Vick is the highest rated Quarterback in the NFC South, (if you include rushing). (1 Viewer)

What the?

LOL K

Lord knows Saints fans really care what the "think tank" over there is saying or what they think.

For a chuckle, perhaps. But geez to bring it here..... petty.

This is a "discussion board". We, (I, in this case), bring this "petty" tid bit from there to here for that reason. It seems to have been pretty effective, as you will note by the "discussion" it generated. Lively, entertaining and dare I say, even educational, (for some, including myself).

But then again, I guess you serve us here by proving the old addage,...........there is ONE in every crowd.

Thanks for you input.
 
I guess you could find a way to manipulate the QB rating to include rushing yards but that would mean you would actually have to know the formula for the QB rating which I'm not sure if anyone has figured it out. So I'd have to say the guy made it up out of thin air. Remember these are the same fans who are arguing if Vick is better than Payton Manning.
 
yeah, i saw that box where you could insert rushing yards and TDs...wait, no i didn't

I described in detail what I equated things like Rushing Yards, Rushes, TDs, etc, too in great detail in a post earlier in this thread which you read and responded too. If you didn't fully comprehend that post, I apologize, but I don't feel as though I can explain it any more clearly then I already have.
 
I described in detail what I equated things like Rushing Yards, Rushes, TDs, etc, too in great detail in a post earlier in this thread which you read and responded too. If you didn't fully comprehend that post, I apologize, but I don't feel as though I can explain it any more clearly then I already have.


yeah...i know man..it was a joke....perhaps a :ezbill: should have been included
 
Using this "new QB rating" what was Aaron Brooks rating like from 2001-2004?
 
Using this "new QB rating" what was Aaron Brooks rating like from 2001-2004?

Without running the numbers, it'd be much worse due to the fumbles and his sack yardage usually exceeding his rush yardage.
 
Without running the numbers, it'd be much worse due to the fumbles and his sack yardage usually exceeding his rush yardage.

I guess your right. Over those 4 seasons he had 20 fumbles lost but had 11 rushing TD's and about 1000 yards rushing, not to mention the huge losses he took on some of those sacks.
 
This is a "discussion board". We, (I, in this case), bring this "petty" tid bit from there to here for that reason. It seems to have been pretty effective, as you will note by the "discussion" it generated. Lively, entertaining and dare I say, even educational, (for some, including myself).

But then again, I guess you serve us here by proving the old addage,...........there is ONE in every crowd.

Thanks for you input.

Hey no problem.

By all means, go ahead and "edumacate" yourself on a "new" stat that doesnt exist.
 
All I have to say to this (Falcon fans saying Vick is highest rated QB WITH rushing)..... HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA...... Desperate fans reach for anything.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom