Why do you dislike Hillary Clinton? (1 Viewer)

[TPS]

>>My having voted for Bush or not has nothing to do with Hillary vs. Obama. I've made no statements as to whether Hillary would be a better president than Obama, only that she is arguably more qualified to serve.

No one said it did. But he was arguably not particularly qualified either. It doesn't matter at this point whether he was or he wasn't. You get on the job experience pretty quick nowadays.

>>Yeah but it's fairly safe to say that Hillary was voted into Senate in NY based on her name and name alone.

There is no doubt about that.

TPS

 

[keepoursaints]

>>My having voted for Bush or not has nothing to do with Hillary vs. Obama. I've made no statements as to whether Hillary would be a better president than Obama, only that she is arguably more qualified to serve.

No one said it did. But he was arguably not particularly qualified either. It doesn't matter at this point whether he was or he wasn't. You get on the job experience pretty quick nowadays.

>>Yeah but it's fairly safe to say that Hillary was voted into Senate in NY based on her name and name alone.

There is no doubt about that.

TPS

Again I repeat.. there's really nothing I like about her and how much she flip flops her stance based on the crowd she's speaking to is a huge turnoff (not as much as her cankles).

That said I really just feel like we're screwed regardless with the "choices" we have.

 

[TPS]

>>Again I repeat.. there's really nothing I like about her and how much she flip flops her stance based on the crowd she's speaking to is a huge turnoff (not as much as her cankles).

I don't so much care about the cankles as much as she tailors what she says to whom she says it.

>>That said I really just feel like we're screwed regardless with the "choices" we have.

I disagree completely. I'm pretty happy about McCain and Obama right now who were the two candidates I had hoped would emerge as nominees for their respective parties. Nader's in and the Libertarian convention is in the summer, and you never know if anyone else like Bloomberg might end up running as an independent. So I've got 3 choices now, each with an opportunity to lose my vote. McCain does it by playing to the base of the GOP and choosing hard right running mate or social conservative Anti-American. Obama loses it by picking Hillary or failing to nominate a credible VP. The Libertarians lose it by nominating another angry white guy. But as for now, I'm okay with the front runners.

TPS

 

[OldSaintFan]

I think that she is a mean vindictive woman, and is running just so that Bill can be the power in the white house again. She would be a front for him. I do not trust either one of them.

 

[TPS]

>>I do not trust either one of them.

While I certainly agree with this, do you trust Dick Cheney or President Bush?

TPS

 

[tenordas]

What's to like about the Hildebeast?
She's a typical politician who will promise anything to what she believes is her constituency.

Relatedly, she's a flopper on many issues that aren't strictly polarized conservative/liberal (because she wants to pretend she's always been on the side of the prevailing wind).

She's a "True Believer" in liberalism and will attack anyone not completely on her side.

She's a total ladder-climber and doesn't care at all who she steps on to reach the next rung.

She's a total polarizer (I've read multiple reports of her being angry with Billyboy any time he invited a Republican (the ENEMY) to the White House. That's just stupid.

She has more skeletons in her closet than Charles Manson (yes, I know, but hyperbole can be our friend, too).

Again, what's to like?

While I certainly agree with this, do you trust Dick Cheney or President Bush?

I know it wasn't directed to me, but my answer to that question is no. I don't trust them any more than I do the Billary twins, which means I don't want either set of them having any part of running my government, thank you very much.

 

[SoonerJim]

Regarding the experience asset, George Will recently penned an article on tow consecutive Presidents, the first being a member of the Pennnsylvania General Assembly, US House, minister to Russia, Sect of State, minister to Great Britain, and US senator. The second was a state house member for eight years, bounced out of the US House after one term, and lost a race for the US senate.

By the above criteria, there's no question the former resume entails future greatness. Answers below:


































James Buchanan
Abe Lincoln

 

[keepoursaints]

>>Again I repeat.. there's really nothing I like about her and how much she flip flops her stance based on the crowd she's speaking to is a huge turnoff (not as much as her cankles).

I don't so much care about the cankles as much as she tailors what she says to whom she says it.

>>That said I really just feel like we're screwed regardless with the "choices" we have.

I disagree completely. I'm pretty happy about McCain and Obama right now who were the two candidates I had hoped would emerge as nominees for their respective parties. Nader's in and the Libertarian convention is in the summer, and you never know if anyone else like Bloomberg might end up running as an independent. So I've got 3 choices now, each with an opportunity to lose my vote. McCain does it by playing to the base of the GOP and choosing hard right running mate or social conservative Anti-American. Obama loses it by picking Hillary or failing to nominate a credible VP. The Libertarians lose it by nominating another angry white guy. But as for now, I'm okay with the front runners.

TPS

I think it will definitely be interesting to see who each frontrunner candidate picks as their VP running mate..

 

[Saint Mike]

>>My having voted for Bush or not has nothing to do with Hillary vs. Obama. I've made no statements as to whether Hillary would be a better president than Obama, only that she is arguably more qualified to serve.

No one said it did. But he was arguably not particularly qualified either. It doesn't matter at this point whether he was or he wasn't. You get on the job experience pretty quick nowadays.

>>Yeah but it's fairly safe to say that Hillary was voted into Senate in NY based on her name and name alone.

There is no doubt about that.

TPS

Lol. You brought it up, not me.

 

[TPS]

>>Lol. You brought it up, not me.

I see what you're saying - I brought it up re: qualifications.

TPS