- Banned
- #29
DadsDream
Dreaming of a SAINTS Super Bowl!
Offline
I know one thing - the first time Al-Qaeda or any of these kooks make President Hillary's administration look bad, she's going to make George Bush look like a pacifist.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Source? Littlegreenfootballs or AQ?
I know one thing - the first time Al-Qaeda or any of these kooks make President Hillary's administration look bad, she's going to make George Bush look like a pacifist.
Really, I personally have very few close friends who could vote for Hillary. I just can't do it and I have a hard time seeing how she could be elected.
If the Democrats want to undermine their cause, nominate her.
Worst thread ever.
No, let's dismiss Al-Qaeda's threats as mere rhetoric, demagoguery and scare tactics being used by an ousted lame duck American political party.
Ignore them and they'll go away!
Consider the source, indeed.
The counter point is the terrorist organizations and the states that sponser them or support their cause in other ways are indeed celebrating the Democrats power sweep.I think you're confusing two different issues here.
So a bunch of Al-Queda thugs claim that it is "reasonable" to vote democratic, and viola! Republicans have a reason to point fingers and claim that a vote for the Democratic Party is to support Al-Queda.
Nobody here on this message board claims that Al-Queada ISN'T a threat.
I think I speak for many when I say that it is patently ridiculous to imply that Democrats will embrace a "pro-terrorist" policy--which is what the premise of the initial post was.
I think you're confusing two different issues here.
So a bunch of Al-Queda thugs claim that it is "reasonable" to vote democratic, and viola! Republicans have a reason to point fingers and claim that a vote for the Democratic Party is to support Al-Queda.
Nobody here on this message board claims that Al-Queada ISN'T a threat.
I think I speak for many when I say that it is patently ridiculous to imply that Democrats will embrace a "pro-terrorist" policy--which is what the premise of the initial post was.
So two different issues here--ignoring Al-Queada threats--real threats, which should be the job of intel officials, and looking at ridiculous, false rhetoric from Al-Queda for what it is.
As if Al-Queda all of a sudden will lay down their arms and embrace the United States if the Democrats gain the White House in 08'
The partisan demegogues simply insult everyone's intelligence.