SweetT
VIP Contributor
Offline
We could have had Tevin Coleman. For a little more than Murray. Good lord
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
We could have had Tevin Coleman. For a little more than Murray. Good lord
Yeah, seems like we jumped the gun on the Murray signing, although I do think he fits with what we want to do, but damn we could have been a little more patientSeems like we could have kept Ingram for a little more money too...
Exactly what I was thinking. Having Coleman would have allowed SP to run the same type of plays when either he or Kamara is in the game. Like I said before, I’m good with Murray, but damn it felt like a “rush” signing.It feels like the Coleman signing last year.
Jumping the gun with a signing before the market is set for the position.
I’ve already stated that I’m good with the Murray pick, but for just a little more money, we could’ve resigned MI or got Coleman. The issue is the quickness that we signed Murray. Maybe SP did want him bad enough to nab him that early, idk. In hindsight, it would’ve been nice to just have had a little patience with selecting a RB, after seeing what MI and Coleman signed for. Personally, I wanted Coleman bc I felt like he would have flourished in our system. He pretty darn versatile. More so than MI or Murray, imhoI think sone of you are overreacting. We got Murray for a good price. I get the feeling that CSP targeted him as the guy he wanted if we couldn’t re-sign MI. I love Ingram. I wanted him back. But not signing him isn’t as bad as some of you are making it out to be.
How much is “a little more money”. Seems we save a good penny by going with Murray. Valuable dollars we can now spend elsewhere, like DT, TE, or S.I’ve already stated that I’m good with the Murray pick, but for just a little more money, we could’ve resigned MI or got Coleman. The issue is the quickness that we signed Murray. Maybe SP did want him bad enough to nab him that early, idk. In hindsight, it would’ve been nice to just have had a little patience with selecting a RB, after seeing what MI and Coleman signed for. Personally, I wanted Coleman bc I felt like he would have flourished in our system. He pretty darn versatile. More so than MI or Murray, imho
Murray is getting paid a little more than $4 million a year. MI and Coleman signed for $5 million a year. Murray 4 year deal. MI 3 year deal. Coleman 2 year dealHow much is “a little more money”. Seems we save a good penny by going with Murray. Valuable dollars we can now spend elsewhere, like DT, TE, or S.
Okay. His contract is still less than Ingram’s. Every dollar you save gives you more room for someone else.Murray is getting paid a little more than $4 million a year. MI and Coleman signed for $5 million a year. Murray 4 year deal. MI 3 year deal. Coleman 2 year deal
Seems like we could have kept Ingram for a little more money too...