Offline
Great retort - very insightful.
I know. But when you just completely make up ideas and posts them off as a credible opinion, i'm not sure what else you want. I'm trying to keep my retort civil. You posted completely wrong thoughts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Great retort - very insightful.
Dismissible by who? It's already out there now.If it went against the court order, that evidence no matter how damniing, becomes dismissable in theoryRumor Mill
Find all of the latest ProFootballTalk news, live coverage, videos, highlights, stats, predictions, and results right here on NBC Sports.www.nbcsports.com
Is that what happened?
....Bensel – the teams’ vice-president for communications – wrote an email to Lauscha on 1 November 2018, the day before the clergy-abuse list was released. Using common abbreviations for “conference call” and “with”, Bensel wrote: “Had a cc w [New Orleans’ then district attorney] Leon Cannizzaro last night that allowed us to take certain people off the list.”
Bensel nor anyone else with the Saints is facing criminal charges. I don't anticipate anyone even facing a civil trial for any of this. Dismissible evidence won't ever come into play here.If it went against the court order, that evidence no matter how damniing, becomes dismissable in theory
Going through this mental exercise of taking out the emotional ties we have, as 'fans', to this organization and really looking at this situation is totally on-point. Picture Elon/Tesla, Bill Gates/MS, or whatever major corporation out there doing this. At the very least this billion-dollar company is using its resources to advise/put a PR spin on a religious organization weathering (yet another) storm of children being raped. Even to the point of suggesting certain accused names being taken off of a list to avoid public embarrassment.This…..
For everyone saying it’s a non story it’s irrelevant what you think or the rest of us think. It’s what the NFL thinks. At the end of the day I’m pretty sure that most of you here can take your little Saints fan glasses off for a second and realize that even if Tesla’s PR rep did what Bensel did that it would be newsworthy and cause some business issues for Elon. Mrs Gayle and the Saints are not immune or exempt from criticism by the media/AP/NFL executives or Goodell on this matter.
TBH with the state of both franchises Mrs Gayle would probably be better off selling both teams anyways folks. As a Saints and Pelicans fan myself I just hope that the NFL will abide by her plan to keep the Saints in New Orleans and allow Dennis Lausca to facilitate the sale to an owner or ownership group committed to keeping the franchise in New Orleans as originally agreed upon by the NFL back in 2021. As for the Pelicans well that’s an another question because the NBA was less committal.
The Guardian article linked in the OP, muckraking as it it, is actually worth the read. Just to know what's being accused. At its heart:
"Yet what remained hidden until now are more than 300 emails, amounting to more than 700 pages, many emblazoned with the NFL and NBA logos, showing that the teams’ officials were more involved with some of the church’s operations than they ever admitted. They expose how extensively the sports teams’ leaders intervened in their local church’s most unyielding scandal."In the most blatant example of that, Bensel – the teams’ vice-president for communications – wrote an email to Lauscha on 1 November 2018, the day before the clergy-abuse list was released. Using common abbreviations for “conference call” and “with”, Bensel wrote: “Had a cc w [New Orleans’ then district attorney] Leon Cannizzaro last night that allowed us to take certain people off the list.”
By the way, Bensel's entire job is to prevent something like this from happening to the Saints.
Going through this mental exercise of taking out the emotional ties we have, as 'fans', to this organization and really looking at this situation is totally on-point. Picture Elon/Tesla, Bill Gates/MS, or whatever major corporation out there doing this. At the very least this billion-dollar company is using its resources to advise/put a PR spin on a religious organization weathering (yet another) storm of children being raped. Even to the point of suggesting certain accused names being taken off of a list to avoid public embarrassment.
This is beyond reprehensible. I don't care how close you are to a church/religious organization. This is something you don't even consider touching, let alone offer your company's resources to.
My initial gut, admittedly emotional, reaction has me questioning my continued fandom. I wouldn't blame Moore, or anyone, in the least if they decided not to work for a company that engages in this.
You can spin it as "oh, how coincidental this piece coming out right now", "old news", conspiracy theories to make the team be sold/moved, or even what appears to be some victim blaming, as much as you want. This is awful horrible, horrendous behavior by an organization that should not be dismissed or just brushed off as a 'nothing burger '.
They are citing quotes from emails. Grow up.it did but leave it to a left winged british news paper to take advantage of the super bowl being in new orleans to spit out a regurgitated news story with slight more intel like its the biggest hit piece in the world for clicks. All of a sudden, a left winged newspaper is going to take the cover up of pedophilia seriously after the past decade plus we've witnessed all sorts of different facets of our lives.
Rumor Mill
Find all of the latest ProFootballTalk news, live coverage, videos, highlights, stats, predictions, and results right here on NBC Sports.www.nbcsports.com
Yep, someone or someone's trying to stir the pot. If it went against the court order, that evidence no matter how damniing, becomes dismissable in theory
There is no manipulation here. the story blew up again because someone released more emails and these emails implicate the saints even more than the prior ones did. The media did not do this, the saints did.It has been, but it seems national news outlets want to blow it up to make it a crisis. One thing I've learned is that when they pick up stories in this fashion (things well known for a long time) there is usually a motive behind it unrelated to journalism.
One of the many reasons I typically stay away from MSM. Manipulation on malleable people has replaced Journalism in that profession.
There is no manipulation here. the story blew up again because someone release more emails and these emails implicate the saints even more than the prior ones did. The media did not do this, the saints did.