Offline
San Fran gotta have a developmental tackle Kubiak is familiar with! Makes you really wonder why we didn't push harder to keep Peat.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was thinking the same thingā¦.If we decide to go this route, we better sign 2 so they can alternate games. These guys wonāt hold up for 17 games.
Doesn't look like it. Here is their current roster of tackles according to their depth chart:San Fran gotta have a developmental tackle Kubiak is familiar with! Makes you really wonder why we didn't push harder to keep Peat.
San Fran gotta have a developmental tackle Kubiak is familiar with! Makes you really wonder why we didn't push harder to keep Peat.
Landon Young has been on the team 3 years was a 6th round pick by the Saints and watching the tape where Penning is awful Landon Young on the same plays (RG) next to Penning) doesnt really look any better - even to my untrained eyes looks even worse.Penning can't possibly be better than his backups. There's no way anybody that isn't a 1st rounder is still in the League after 2 years of Penning level performance.
Going into the season with openings at both LT and LG, having a backup with recent experience that we could plug into both would be pretty valuable regardless. Our two veteran signings have 177 snaps between them in the last two years (0 for Davis, 177 for Udoh). Peat played 1,382 snaps over the same time period, with a rough even split between LT and LG.While I think they should have kept Peat as depth at LT and LG, if they were dead set on Fuaga at LT, Peat doesn't really help the RT problem. Peat simply can not play on the right side for whatever reason.
Landon Young has been on the team 3 years was a 6th round pick by the Saints and watching the tape where Penning is awful Landon Young on the same plays (RG) next to Penning) doesnt really look any better - even to my untrained eyes looks even worse.
Im guessing the issues is there arent many planet sized people, much less with grit and motivation and even less with the talent and discipline to do what is not natural in order to be technically sound.
Going into the season with openings at both LT and LG, having a backup with recent experience that we could plug into both would be pretty valuable regardless. Our two veteran signings have 177 snaps between them in the last two years (0 for Davis, 177 for Udoh). Peat played 1,382 snaps over the same time period, with a rough even split between LT and LG.
I would take Peat at LT and Fuaga at RT right about now.While I think they should have kept Peat as depth at LT and LG, if they were dead set on Fuaga at LT, Peat doesn't really help the RT problem. Peat simply can not play on the right side for whatever reason.
Agree that Penning should not have been penciled in as a potential starter anywhere on the line. Looks like we fell for the sunk cost fallacy on this one. What we already had invested at the position shouldn't have mattered.I totally agree having Peat to backup LT and backup/start at LG would have been the right thing to do. I'm just saying that if they are set on Fuaga at LT having Peat doesn't help the RT problem. If they were dead set on Fuaga at LT then they should have singed a more experienced/more sure thing veteran at RT to compete with Penning for the job. I really don't get why they essentially handed the RT job to Penning.
Personally, I would have signed Peat or someone else to start at LT and given Penning a chance to try to beat him/them out while keeping Fuaga as the starter at RT. But, I'm just a fan so I could be totally wrong.
Snaps by position are from PFF.What website is this from, and is it a free or paid/subscription site?