Infoman
You're a Towel!
Offline
Tet will be a top 5 pick.
Jeanty is a RB which is the only position group as far as offensive playmakers we do not need.
Top 10 pick spent on Warren would be bad team building.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tet will be a top 5 pick.
Jeanty is a RB which is the only position group as far as offensive playmakers we do not need.
Top 10 pick spent on Warren would be bad team building.
So you think Warren is worth a top 10 pick?
So you think Warren is worth a top 10 pick?
You think we NEED help at RB compared to other positions?
That's absolutely interesting please explain
That’s my main concern with this mock draft. I would rather wait a year to get Carr’s contract off the books and to get a better idea of Rattler’s progress. In 2026, look for a QB.
Interesting.I have posted many times in other threads on this...
There will be QBs, DL, and OL going fast and often in the top 5 - 10... T-Mac can easily slip down into the 8-16 range.
We need playmakers at every position - RB is not the exception - AK will be 30, Taysom will be 35, and Miller hasn't been available for most of the 2 seasons he's been here.
Warren can go anywhere from 8 on down - a premium TE is becoming every bit as valuable in the NFL due to how many teams are playing 2 high all day long - Nearly Every real contender of a team has one. You can absolutely build a very good offense around one. I think he not only has that potential... I think his versatility and athletic ability makes him even more valuable than a traditional TE prospect.
We do this every year - and every year our offense doesn't get better - and every year I say how players like Bowers and Gibbs are worth spending high picks on and everyone acts like I am "interesting"... until they are all forced to agree.
Interesting.
I have posted many times in other threads on this...
There will be QBs, DL, and OL going fast and often in the top 5 - 10... T-Mac can easily slip down into the 8-16 range.
We need playmakers at every position - RB is not the exception - AK will be 30, Taysom will be 35, and Miller hasn't been available for most of the 2 seasons he's been here.
Warren can go anywhere from 8 on down - a premium TE is becoming every bit as valuable in the NFL due to how many teams are playing 2 high all day long - Nearly Every real contender of a team has one. You can absolutely build a very good offense around one. I think he not only has that potential... I think his versatility and athletic ability makes him even more valuable than a traditional TE prospect.
We do this every year - and every year our offense doesn't get better - and every year I say how players like Bowers and Gibbs are worth spending high picks on and everyone acts like I am "interesting"... until they are all forced to agree.
No shot the top WR in the class is available anywhere near pick 16.There will be QBs, DL, and OL going fast and often in the top 5 - 10... T-Mac can easily slip down into the 8-16 range.
RB is the exception. AK while 30 can still and should still carry the load. He's one of the top paid RBs in the entire league. We also just spend a premium pick on Miller and you want to spend the best draft pick we have had in the last decade on another RB??We need playmakers at every position - RB is not the exception - AK will be 30, Taysom will be 35, and Miller hasn't been available for most of the 2 seasons he's been here.
Warren is not going to be a top 10 pick lmao. He's a fine TE but far from a generational one like Bowers who himself didn't go top 10.Warren can go anywhere from 8 on down - a premium TE is becoming every bit as valuable in the NFL due to how many teams are playing 2 high all day long - Nearly Every real contender of a team has one. You can absolutely build a very good offense around one. I think he not only has that potential... I think his versatility and athletic ability makes him even more valuable than a traditional TE prospect.
As great as Bowers has been he hasn't translated to wins. The Raiders are one of the worst teams in the entire NFL. This is what you're missing about selecting a TE early. It's not that an elite one can be critical to an offense it's just they don't translate to winning unless you're already stacked at other positions which we are not.We do this every year - and every year our offense doesn't get better - and every year I say how players like Bowers and Gibbs are worth spending high picks on and everyone acts like I am "interesting"... until they are all forced to agree.
To be fair, we drafted a WR at #11 and a LT at #19 3 years ago and took a LT at #14 last year. That's 3 first round picks on the offense in 3 years. We all want more playmakers, but it's not like they haven't spent first round draft capital on the offense and Bowers was taken before we picked last year.
And after seeing our OL with Fuaga and Penning this year, I can't imagine how bad it would have been without them.
Anway, I thought you were a BPA guy? Are you now a BPA at an offensive skill position guy?
No shot the top WR in the class is available anywhere near pick 16.
RB is the exception. AK while 30 can still and should still carry the load. He's one of the top paid RBs in the entire league. We also just spend a premium pick on Miller and you want to spend the best draft pick we have had in the last decade on another RB??
Warren is not going to be a top 10 pick lmao. He's a fine TE but far from a generational one like Bowers who himself didn't go top 10.
I don't disagree an elite TE can be incredible weapon, I just disagree how highly you hav Warren rated.
As great as Bowers has been he hasn't translated to wins. The Raiders are one of the worst teams in the entire NFL. This is what you're missing about selecting a TE early. It's not that an elite one can be critical to an offense it's just they don't translate to winning unless you're already stacked at other positions which we are not.
Besides Fuaga has been an incredible rookie LT for us so and far more important than Bowers ever would have been. I have no clue why you're taking a victory lap with that take.
False. I do not think we can compete next year at all.We are picking before 16 sir... This is a Wendy's. You are still thinking we can win and compete next year, and I am thinking about building a young offensive core for our next QB and coach so we can be fun to watch and competitive while we lose until we get both...
I disagree here as well. Both of us were high on LaPorta if I remember correctly. I don't have Warren in the same tier as either, definitely not a tier above. Warren is also a 5th year senior. There's plenty of data that shows 5th year breakout seniors are red flags.Warren is a better prospect than Kincaid and LaPorta - Go watch the vids.... From a high level he's one of the best offensive weapons in this draft not named T-Mac or Jeanty.
Bowers was the best TE in the NFL this year and he's STILL not more important than Fuaga has been. Which goes back to my point TEs do not contribute to winning as much as other positions. You've said we are building for the future... there is no better building block than a young dominant LT.Bowers was the best TE in the NFL this year on the worst team with the worst QB room - He's a building block for a bad team - We need guys like that, because we are not far behind... Fuaga is great - He doesn't score points....