- Moderator
- #63,871
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2002
- Messages
- 36,997
- Reaction score
- 47,862
- Age
- 49
Offline
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But did you know about it as it happened? I knew folks still in the business at the time and didn't know until a week later.I think it has to do with the audience being primarily composed of (at the time) "newer" wrestling fans (post-nWo, post-Attitude era, post-Goldberg, etc.). Among long-time wrestling fans, the scissors story is famous.
No, but the actual event happened many years before the Russo-WCW era that was referenced.But did you know about it as it happened? I knew folks still in the business at the time and didn't know until a week later.
So in one night, it seems Hangman drugged Swerve before taking him out with a headshot with a chair. Then Moxley tried to murder Danielson ala Terry Funk with a plastic bag. What in the hell?
Khan will claim the chair was doctored, but so what. sheet is just dumb.The facepalm isn't towards you, it's towards them for doing that bullshirt. It's like Abyss in TNA when he got his two by four with nails on it that he named after Dixie Carter's mom Janice and would hit people with it. There's no room in wrestling for that type of thing to me.
Yeah, regardless what people think about wrestling, kids and dumb adults will watch this thinking they can safely do this at home. Drugs, concussions, blackouts, whatever else that are outcomes that can be severe for someone, all for entertainment. Some would say it's not real, like a movie, but kids and adults do role play and do sheet like this at home and don't understand how risky it is.Khan will claim the chair was doctored, but so what. sheet is just dumb.
Oh, so you're excusing this nonsense? I see how it is.I, too, found it odd that the blood feud b/w a man who stalked the other and cut a promo over his infant's crib and the man who burned down the childhood home of that same man would lead to such a violent match.
To be fair, why is it nonsense? I would argue that it was very consistent to the feud and story being told, complete with Hangman’s post-match breakdown (seemingly uncomfortable with who & what he’s become- “was ‘vengeance’ worth it?”).Oh, so you're excusing this nonsense? I see how it is.