Online
these can’t be the only optionsI agree with your sentiment as well and wish it was so, but unless folks are willing to give up the right to sue a PD we have what we have.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
these can’t be the only optionsI agree with your sentiment as well and wish it was so, but unless folks are willing to give up the right to sue a PD we have what we have.
The inability to sue wouldn't help.Lawsuit. Depts are concerned and rightfully so that any admission can and will be used against them.
I agree with your sentiment as well and wish it was so, but unless folks are willing to give up the right to sue a PD we have what we have.
Malice in the shooting? No, probably just cowardice.well, anythime they knowingly lie about things, its not gonna look good for them. The dept had to be aware of the video footage and undoubtedly watched it, but still say it was unclear if it was her getting out of the car when they have the audio of an officer saying it was her.
When you have been sitting on the footage of this for 2 years refusing to release it and still not giving the correcdt story, they HAD to know eventually video and audio evidence was gonna be realsed., But they were gonna stick to thier guns and claim officers didn't know it was here.
Do i think it was Malice? no. Do i think the way they seemed to have handled it wrong? absolutely.
They were scared that the father could fire on them and had a hair trigger finger, and at the first thought of danger they just let the bullets fly. they were terrified.
I would never want to be a poice officer, this is one of the reasons. but i can admit that..
good point.Malice in the shooting? No, probably just cowardice.
Malice in the coverup? Abso-freaking-lutely.
But lawsuits don't hurt tge dept. It hurts the citizens that fund the city or county that has to fork over the moneywell, some dept's deserve the pants sued off them..
budget cuts to depts do happen because of them . media and other outlets needs to do a better job at outing when this happens. when a dept is pleaing with the public because of budget cuts it needs to be front and center on how much money the dept has cost the district because of terrible employees causing lawsuits..But lawsuits don't hurt tge dept. It hurts the citizens that fund the city or county that has to fork over the money
I'm not certain if it's a legal requirement or if it's good city management but I believe most cities carry insurrence to cover lawsuits.budget cuts to depts do happen because of them . media and other outlets needs to do a better job at outing when this happens. when a dept is pleaing with the public because of budget cuts it needs to be front and center on how much money the dept has cost the district because of terrible employees causing lawsuits..
I would love to see it tied to pensionsI'm not certain if it's a legal requirement or if it's good city management but I believe most cities carry insurrence to cover lawsuits.
So you want to punish the innocent. Why not sue the officer/officers that are responsible?I would love to see it tied to pensions
Yes THEIR pensions/retirementSo you want to punish the innocent. Why not sue the officer/officers that are responsible?
Never happen. Surely you'd see legal action taken by those who would claim its not fair to those who weren't involved in those situations.I would love to see it tied to pensions
Well, im glad your not a cop seeing how your ok with punishing innocent people.Yes THEIR pensions/retirement
I think by THEIR he means specifically the ones who are committing crimes.Well, im glad your not a cop seeing how your ok with punishing innocent people.
I also believe if an officer violates criminal law he loses immunity. I do know if they violate your rights they lose immunity.Never happen. Surely you'd see legal action taken by those who would claim its not fair to those who weren't involved in those situations.
Regardless, I'm not sure how they'd legally be able to pull money from their pension plans.
The better way to attack this is to remove qualified immunity, or at the very least, modify it so that it's only applicable in a narrow set of circumstances.