- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
- Messages
- 16,012
- Reaction score
- 18,988
Offline
I meant it as more of an are they going keep him and see if he can stay healthy or cut bait now.I'm sure it will be the same as everyone else, "wish he could stay healthy."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I meant it as more of an are they going keep him and see if he can stay healthy or cut bait now.I'm sure it will be the same as everyone else, "wish he could stay healthy."
LOL And yet we went 11-5,13-3,13-3 12-4 and should have made it to the SB if not for the No-Call , with an almost done Brees. SP saw something in Mahomes that made him want to take him. If it was such a great need with an " Almost Done Brees" why didn't he take one in the yrs that followed?? He could have taken Jackson the next yr. Or Love in 2020. SMHWe’ve needed one since 2017, when everyone knew Brees was almost done. Why do you think Payton wanted Mahomes?
I asked my Dad about that. He is an inactive OG from this site and had some part/input into the rules. He said it has been worded as it is for close to 20 years. The first part of the rule essentially says that the quoted portion you reference is for non-paysites. What I quoted here is just for pay sites.I actually didn’t know that was the current rule. Did that change fairly recently, because I’ve been here a long time and always remember one quoted paragraph from a pay article was okay?
What relevance do our records with Brees have? Are you really that incapable of understanding the point, or are you being deliberately obtuse?LOL And yet we went 11-5,13-3,13-3 12-4 and should have made it to the SB if not for the No-Call , with an almost done Brees. SP saw something in Mahomes that made him want to take him. If it was such a great need with an " Almost Done Brees" why didn't he take one in the yrs that followed?? He could have taken Jackson the next yr. Or Love in 2020. SMH
No, it doesn't help the team in the next few years. It's more salary cap kicking that is the result of past mistakes.I've had a couple vodaks. Does this deal in any way help the saints in the next few years? We aren't winning it all with Carr. He isn't the long term solution. Can some one explain if this helps the team to get past our current problems.
I mean it pushes more dead money to the future, however it further leads to the belief that this is his last season here and he will be post June 1 cut next year and we will have to eat at least 30mil in dead cap just for Carr in 2026 and 2027. Essentially if Rattler aint him we will be baaaad in 2026.I've had a couple vodaks. Does this deal in any way help the saints in the next few years? We aren't winning it all with Carr. He isn't the long term solution. Can some one explain if this helps the team to get past our current problems.
Not sure why we continue to debate Carr on this page. He’s a mid QB who you can win with, but not because of. He needs everything around him to be perfect to have a serious shot at a championship (and that’s being kind). Yet, he’s unwilling to take a pay cut that would improve the chances of that happening.
Winston was a below average QB but the fans embraced him because he embraced us and the city. Carr talks a good game but delivers little and has shown he doesn’t give a damn about New Orleans. It doesn’t help when his brothers consistently spout nonsense on social media either.
The usual homers on here can continue to defend him but the sooner he’s off this team the better. 8-9 seasons might excite some, but no thank you.
It was the only realistic option financially. They can add free agents the next two years to rebuild and change their schemes. Preferably, young long term contracts this year. The only way to ever rebuild the roster was to draft well regardless.I've had a couple vodaks. Does this deal in any way help the saints in the next few years? We aren't winning it all with Carr. He isn't the long term solution. Can some one explain if this helps the team to get past our current problems.
Because your statement that Brees was almost done so we needed to take a QB in the 1st was ridiculous. As evident by our record from 2017 -2020. THAT'S the point There was not a need to take a QB in the 1st at that time.What relevance do our records with Brees have? Are you really that incapable of understanding the point, or are you being deliberately obtuse?
Also, funny you mention Love. Why do you think the Packers took him?
If the plan is to rebuild through free agency, the biggest issue is QB. There’s many philosophies but how do you get a good one if you’re never at the top of the draft? This is the closest we’ve been to the #1 pick since 2008, and that was still only pick #7.It was the only realistic option financially. They can add free agents the next two years to rebuild and change their schemes. Preferably, young long term contracts this year. The only way to ever rebuild the roster was to draft well regardless.
I've heard a few people say that as a society we have lost a lot of respect for people with experience, advanced knowledge and/or expertise. I think it's true and it's a significant problem. Society falls apart if too many people think they know better than the people who actually know better.This goes for more than just sports reporters. At some point people began believing that their way is the best way to run/fix a football team and when the team doesn’t follow their exact lead, all hell breaks loose and tantrums get thrown. It wasn’t always like this.
I've had a couple vodaks. Does this deal in any way help the saints in the next few years? We aren't winning it all with Carr. He isn't the long term solution. Can some one explain if this helps the team to get past our current problems.
Getting a QB is a crap shoot regardless. If you think one is worth it, trade up for him. Just like the Chiefs did with Mahommes after going 12-4.If the plan is to rebuild through free agency, the biggest issue is QB. There’s many philosophies but how do you get a good one if you’re never at the top of the draft? This is the closest we’ve been to the #1 pick since 2008, and that was still only pick #7.