Saints expected to be very interested in former Cowboys HC Mike McCarthy [ Rapoport: Interview to be early next week] (99 Viewers)

He was the HC but McCarthy was his boy just like DA being Loomis’s boy and it taking almost 3 years to get rid of him. Jim Haslett didn’t make any offensive personnel calls. Might want to do your homework.

How’s this for homework? ;)

In Haslett’s own words:

"We had a chance to go to the playoffs, and I got hardheaded because Aaron Brooks got hurt," Haslett told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch last week. "I should've put the backup in, and didn't. Everybody wanted the backup in, and I didn't. In hindsight, I probably should have because the backup turned out to be a pretty darn good quarterback, Jake Delhomme."

 
How’s this for homework? ;)

In Haslett’s own words:

"We had a chance to go to the playoffs, and I got hardheaded because Aaron Brooks got hurt," Haslett told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch last week. "I should've put the backup in, and didn't. Everybody wanted the backup in, and I didn't. In hindsight, I probably should have because the backup turned out to be a pretty darn good quarterback, Jake Delhomme."




Welp, that narrative took the ole Edmund Fitzgerald ride to the bottom of the lake.
 
He was the HC but McCarthy was his boy just like DA being Loomis’s boy and it taking almost 3 years to get rid of him. Jim Haslett didn’t make any offensive personnel calls. Might want to do your homework.

Where are you getting this stuff? McCarthy left the Saints the year before Haslet was fired and was replaced by Mike Sheppard. If McCarthy was Haslett's boy he sure had an odd way of showing it.

He didn't get rid of him for three years because he was running a very good offense. In 2002 the Saints led the NFC in scoring, with 49 touchdowns and 432 points. In 2003, the Saints scored 340 points—their eighth highest-scoring season ever. All of McCarthy's four years with the Saints rank in the team's top 10 years for offense at the time.

So maybe you didn't do your homework?
 
How’s this for homework? ;)

In Haslett’s own words:

"We had a chance to go to the playoffs, and I got hardheaded because Aaron Brooks got hurt," Haslett told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch last week. "I should've put the backup in, and didn't. Everybody wanted the backup in, and I didn't. In hindsight, I probably should have because the backup turned out to be a pretty darn good quarterback, Jake Delhomme."

Yep, the people making stuff up and trying to rewrite history are being completely unreasonable.

I can understand why some don't want him, but at least be honest about history.
 
How’s this for homework? ;)

In Haslett’s own words:

"We had a chance to go to the playoffs, and I got hardheaded because Aaron Brooks got hurt," Haslett told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch last week. "I should've put the backup in, and didn't. Everybody wanted the backup in, and I didn't. In hindsight, I probably should have because the backup turned out to be a pretty darn good quarterback, Jake Delhomme."

Total mic-drop here...mouths got shut in a hurry. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
The odds are stacked because of the tiny sample size and because winning SBs is difficult in general, not because there is some evil magic or deal with the devil that SB winning head coaches made preventing them from doing it again.
I never said anything about evil magic or deals with the devil. I'm just pointing out it has not happened, and I don't think McCarthy will buck the trend.
 
Half the fans hated Brooks, the other half hated Jake. Those were the days. :hihi:
Indeed. That era was fun, crawl game was great aside from the ending lol. (Vikings game 02)

I also liked both guys and wanted Jake in as Aaron was clearly hurt. Oh well, is what it is.
 
He was the HC but McCarthy was his boy just like DA being Loomis’s boy and it taking almost 3 years to get rid of him. Jim Haslett didn’t make any offensive personnel calls. Might want to do your homework.
Are you actually talking about something false from 23 years ago, to justify something now? Is that all you have?
 
Off the top of my head:
Mike Ditka (we all know how that went).
Mike Holmgren (Packers (SB) - Seahawks)
George Seifert (49ers (SB) - Panthers)
Mike Shanahan (Broncos (SB) - Redskins)
Jimmy Johnson (Cowboys (SB) - Dolphins)
Bill Parcells (Giants (SB) - Patriots/Jets/Cowboys)

Hank Stram (Chiefs SB - Saints)
 
How’s this for homework? ;)

In Haslett’s own words:

"We had a chance to go to the playoffs, and I got hardheaded because Aaron Brooks got hurt," Haslett told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch last week. "I should've put the backup in, and didn't. Everybody wanted the backup in, and I didn't. In hindsight, I probably should have because the backup turned out to be a pretty darn good quarterback, Jake Delhomme."

Even if you had zero proof, I still wouldn’t believe that a HC would let an OC decide which QB to start. Maybe an OC could make a suggestion, but the HC isn’t going to delegate out roster decisions.
 
Did you know: the most penalized team in the league the last four years is…drumroll…Dallas Cowboys.

Can’t wait to see all the accountability and discipline this overrated turd is gonna bring us. Yall are brilliant
 
Geniunely asking, why do people want Flores after the high profile debacle with Tua...which sort of corroborated the reports that he had a general lack of ability building relationships with....just about anyone from the practice squad to ownership in Miami?

I get he seemed like he mightve regretted some of it, either geniunely or at the direction of his agent I dont know. But this is going to be a pressure cooker here for a year or two trying to resurrect this roster. It seems like taking a chance on a guy like him is far riskier than Glenn.

I don't want him anywhere near a young QB in a HC role.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom