Tea Party begins to split (2 Viewers)

And that brings up a fundamental point to this discussion, that on the federal level, independents candidates are frozen out of consideration. Had Paul ran as an independent, he HAD to remain a Republican just to be invited (though begrudgingly) to the debates.

The 'beat the party by BEING the party' was the method used.

Well, the system we have will not allow change to occur.

I'd embrace a Nader, Paul, Perot, Kuccinch, Pickens, Forbes, whatever....so long as it offered a path to rob/voice dissent with the 2-party system.
There has always been two tea partys. This is what I want some of these liberals to understand. The original tea party is more the Ron Paul(and even Dennis Kuchinich) backers

Is it weird to be a liberal and had actually been a part of THAT movement?
 
Last edited:
If the tea party could have done something like this
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JzO_D8TjvKw&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JzO_D8TjvKw&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
Rather than prod and stoke fear, xenophobia, classism, and anxiety.....(I can't see Palin,Bachman,Beck,Hannity,etc comprehending or articulating any of that)

If either an R or D candidate could do any of that....


We wouldn't be in the mess we're in now
 
Last edited:

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom