Titanic submersible es morte (2 Viewers)

I know a guy…
I feel like a jerk having just learned that people lost their lives. I only read the title and thought that the vehicle itself was missing; hence, the untimely “joke”. I should have read more. Terrible on my part and I’m sorry.
 
I think in the usage here, they’re the same - not different.

1687580558247.png
The curse of a large vocabulary. I used 'apprehend' in the mental capture sense.

*Com-prehension as in understanding, was never in the running. That'd take way too long.

This was over between the shutter-clicks of reality.
 
Last edited:
I feel like a jerk having just learned that people lost their lives. I only read the title and thought that the vehicle itself was missing; hence, the untimely “joke”. I should have read more. Terrible on my part and I’m sorry.
No worries, bro. We've learned that either (a) they were a bunch of rich d-bags who deserved to die, or (b) they were killed by wokeism (or maybe bad engineering).

Either way, your allegedly bad joke has since been FAR surpassed.
 
The curse of a large vocabulary. I used 'apprehend' in the mental capture sense.

*Com-prehension as in understanding, was never in the running. That'd take way too long.

This was over between the shutter-clicks of reality.
Jesus Christ, we already had a discussion about how many millions make a billion. Now this "comprehend" vs "apprehend" stuff?
 
The curse of a large vocabulary. I used 'apprehend' in the mental capture sense.

*Com-prehension as in understanding, was never in the running. That'd take way too long.

This was over between the shutter-clicks of reality.
Sometimes I'm apprehensive.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom