Titanic submersible es morte (1 Viewer)

The article I read, WSJ, conveyed no information about it being shared with the people leading the search. It's fair enough that it wasn't definitive. I would expect that it wouldn't be, and obviously they have no duty to share anything with the media nor the public at large. I would've thought it should be shared once it became an all consuming news story, rather than having broadcasts around the world droning on about how much time they have left. At least one broadcast from overseas was showing an air countdown timer whilst that's not the US Navy's fault they certainly could've largely put it to bed by just sharing their suspicions based on the evidence.

Here are a couple of reports that address it.

A senior Navy official told CNN the Navy detected an acoustic signature consistent with an implosion on Sunday in the general area where the vessel was diving and lost communication with its mother ship.

The Navy immediately relayed that information to on-scene commanders leading the search effort, and it was used to narrow down the area of the search, the official said Thursday.

But the sound of the implosion was determined to be “not definitive,” the official said, and the multinational efforts to find the submersible continued as a search and rescue effort. The Wall Street Journal was first to report about the acoustic signature picked up by the Navy.



“While not definitive, this information was immediately shared with the Incident Commander to assist with the ongoing search and rescue mission,” the statement said. “This information was considered with the compilation of additional acoustic data provided by other partners and the decision was made to continue our mission as a search and rescue and make every effort to save the lives on board.”

Another Navy official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation, said that the service does not typically share such information publicly until the search for survivors ends. The information gathered, this official said, is a “data point.”


 
Here are a couple of reports that address it.

A senior Navy official told CNN the Navy detected an acoustic signature consistent with an implosion on Sunday in the general area where the vessel was diving and lost communication with its mother ship.

The Navy immediately relayed that information to on-scene commanders leading the search effort, and it was used to narrow down the area of the search, the official said Thursday.

But the sound of the implosion was determined to be “not definitive,” the official said, and the multinational efforts to find the submersible continued as a search and rescue effort. The Wall Street Journal was first to report about the acoustic signature picked up by the Navy.



“While not definitive, this information was immediately shared with the Incident Commander to assist with the ongoing search and rescue mission,” the statement said. “This information was considered with the compilation of additional acoustic data provided by other partners and the decision was made to continue our mission as a search and rescue and make every effort to save the lives on board.”

Another Navy official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation, said that the service does not typically share such information publicly until the search for survivors ends. The information gathered, this official said, is a “data point.”


That sounds like a very sensible approach to me.
 
Here are a couple of reports that address it.

A senior Navy official told CNN the Navy detected an acoustic signature consistent with an implosion on Sunday in the general area where the vessel was diving and lost communication with its mother ship.

The Navy immediately relayed that information to on-scene commanders leading the search effort, and it was used to narrow down the area of the search, the official said Thursday.

But the sound of the implosion was determined to be “not definitive,” the official said, and the multinational efforts to find the submersible continued as a search and rescue effort. The Wall Street Journal was first to report about the acoustic signature picked up by the Navy.



“While not definitive, this information was immediately shared with the Incident Commander to assist with the ongoing search and rescue mission,” the statement said. “This information was considered with the compilation of additional acoustic data provided by other partners and the decision was made to continue our mission as a search and rescue and make every effort to save the lives on board.”

Another Navy official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation, said that the service does not typically share such information publicly until the search for survivors ends. The information gathered, this official said, is a “data point.”


You two are derailing the thread. It was bad enough that the discussion of how many millions makes a billion got sidetracked on some tangent.
 
You two are derailing the thread. It was bad enough that the discussion of how many millions makes a billion got sidetracked on some tangent.
And that is perfectly ok. This is how the EE board has worked for more than 20 years
 
I would like to announce a few positions on my election team:

Security: @Complex Kid
Anyone with “Kid” in his name, fast guns. So fast. I asked him to join and he was shaking my hands and knocking down fans so quick. He’s not just quick with his guns either ladies l, if you know what I mean.

Social Media Director: @jboss
Can lay down the tweets and posts so fast. People are going to log on, see a message and before the can respond bam, a message on another app. It’s gonna be great.

Speech Writer: @guidomerkinsrules
Can say so much and so little all at once. You will be left dazed and confused. Most of the time I don’t even know how to respond because I am so confused.

General Consultant: @DaveXA
I trust him completely. Best lawyer. Maybe a position on my Supreme Court one day. A real tough guy.

Policy Advisor: @texasjefe
He impressed me with handling that rude passenger on the last page. He can make the rules. And they’re going to be great rules. Rules like no one has ever seen before.

Communications Director: @Madmarsha
I mean she’s a she. No one communicates like a woman. I have great respect for the women. My mom was a woman. Talked all the time. She can make a mean sandwich too.

Finance Director: @SaintRob
Any man that says he can make the failclowns pay for my paywall, that’s a guy I want. He has experience too. Big walls little walls, it doesn’t matter. They’re all great. People line up just to lean on one of his walls.

Thank you and MAFGA!!! (Make Americas Forums Great Again)
Yeah, I'm going to go ahead and appoint a special prosecutor to investigate your current levels of access and your PM activity. There is obviously some shadiness going on that's going to have to be dealt with.
 
That sounds like a very sensible approach to me.

Yeah, they already knew they were working against time. I don't know that much would change tactically once they transitioned from rescue to recovery, so I don't get the complaints about the approach they took. Important, either way, to hone in on a location, get responders to the scene, and then hope for the best.
 
for those curious about what happens and how quickly...

When a submarine hull collapses, it moves inward at about 1,500mph (2,414km/h) - that's 2,200ft (671m) per second, says Dave Corley, a former US nuclear submarine officer.

The time required for complete collapse is about one millisecond, or one thousandth of a second.

A human brain responds instinctually to a stimulus at about 25 milliseconds, Mr Corley says.

Human rational response - from sensing to acting - is believed to be at best 150 milliseconds.

The air inside a sub has a fairly high concentration of hydrocarbon vapours.

When the hull collapses, the air auto-ignites and an explosion follows the initial rapid implosion, Mr Corley says.

Human bodies incinerate and are turned to ash and dust instantly.

Titan sub implosion: What we know about catastrophic event
 
I hear some people on EE have been throwing my name around a bit in albeit, humorous, silly, hilarious overtones?
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom