- Joined
- Mar 5, 2002
- Messages
- 964
- Reaction score
- 1,319
Offline
I think our next generation of armored vehicles are going to have low/medium powered lasers to shoot down drones like the Navy's Phalanx system for its ships.It will be interesting to look back and see (although I may be dead by the time a definitive and properly arms-length history can be written!) whether this new age of warfare will be a net/net positive or negative to America. Certainly it will be a mixed bag.
For example, I see a potential positive effect (in blood and treasure) if there is enough time to supply and apply the lessons to the potential defense of Taiwan. Or a potentially big negative (primarily to our naval assets) if the lessons aren't applied fast enough and the defense of Taiwan falls largely to those U.S. naval assets against a Chinese opponent which HAS applied such lessons. Likely(?) a potential positive (in treasure and perhaps blood) to a defensive NATO vis-a-vis Russia. And perhaps a (large) negative in asymmetrical conflicts with non-state and smaller-state actors (especially Middle Eastern actors). I suppose there's also a potential positive to the USA given the general unfitness of American youth and the current recruitment difficulties.
Anyone claiming to know for sure what the net-net effect will be is crystal ball gazing, but I bet there is some super interesting War College stuff being discussed across the military experts around the world.