baarbogast
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2002
- Messages
- 20,800
- Reaction score
- 25,133
- Age
- 59
Offline
How convenient
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Waltz gives more details on a potential future energy attack strategy to be implemented against RU. Trump's referenced this strategy in the past months.
If you can't read it, he likens RU to a gas station with nukes. The plan is to strengthen sanctions and ramp up cheap/quality US energy, to cause rapid RU energy revenue losses.
I'm going to start off by apologizing if this was already posted in here. I am not endorsing it....I am asking if those more knowledgeable than I about the history of the region can confirm this account or explain how it is wrong or misrepresenting the recent history.
Discussing the history of the region is less political than a lot of what is already in this thread.This would ultimately end up a politically driven discussion if explained fully, but the simple answer is whether the Russians were baited or not, the Russians invaded Ukraine. The Russians have zero excuse for putting themselves in the position they're in now.
Not saying it's zero, but the lion's share is Russia. Recall that Russia has stuck their nose in Ukraine’s business ever since they became a sovereign nation. It would be the equivalent of us fixing the Mexican Presidential and state political elections.Discussing the history of the region is less political than a lot of what is already in this thread.
While I agree Russia is responsible for their own actions, if NATO and the US have consistently made agreements and violated them, we do bear some responsibility for what is occurring now
I'm going to start off by apologizing if this was already posted in here. I am not endorsing it....I am asking if those more knowledgeable than I about the history of the region can confirm this account or explain how it is wrong or misrepresenting the recent history.
Thank you for setting facts straight. That is what I was looking for. As I stated I wasn't endorsing anything in it....I was looking for historical factsat 2:30 second, Sachs starts naming "latvia, Lithuainia, Slovakia....etc " - 7 countries- ALL OF WHICH were NATO members in 2004.
Not 2014.
Not 2020
Not 2022.
We have had this discussion on the MAP board Ukraine thread by another former poster there who would post every time Sachs spoke.
He has never relented on the NATO expansion narrative. Even when PUTIN himself said it wasnt about that ( then it was, then it wasnt - when its convenient )
He is an economist by training- has no formal foreign policy experience - he has been on this Maidan revolution in 2014 ( that it was a US operation )
IT wasnt- it was a grass roots uprising againts Yanukovich, who was about to sign a pact with Europe, then at LAST MINUTE, said "nope...going with Russia" and THAT is when the people of Ukraine said "enough of Russia"
He is biased to his own reasoning for the Russian invasion. Ignoring so many variables...THE MAIN one being Putin CLEARLY stated that his LEGACY is to be the restoration of the USSR- to USSR/Soviet borders.
Period. end of story.
Thank you for setting facts straight. That is what I was looking for. As I stated I wasn't endorsing anything in it....I was looking for historical facts