What if they interview Brady and his condition for taking the job is canning Loomis? (4 Viewers)

This was a question that popped into my head as I was watching today's podcasts.

We've already seen this happen a couple of times in this cycle.

It's clear that Brady is the guy they're waiting on. If he were their guy, they could have hired McCarthy a week ago.

What if Brady wants the job, but doesn't want Loomis?

Didn’t last coaching hiring cycle, wasn’t DA interviewed in person early and the following 2 or so weeks we interviewed everyone else then announced DA as head coach?

Didn’t we interview Rizzi in person about a week ago and now in the coming week we’ll be interviewing everyone else?
 
As a Jags fan I don’t think that Saints fans realize how bad Baalke was. The Jags situation was very unique. Loomis has done a horrible job over the past few years but he’s still leagues better than Baalke. Brady is overrated. So he was a good OC for the best college offense of all-time and a Josh Allen led offense. Big whoop
 
The thing that scares me about Brady is the success he's had is when he's been given a loaded roster. When he didn't have one, Carolina, it didn't go well. If we pick him I will pull for him to do well, but I just not sure he's ready to be a HC. I hope I'm wrong if we go that route. I also believe if McCarthy gets the job, Carr stays. If Brady gets it, Carr is gone. Just my 2 cents that doesn't mean didley.

Again this is not true. In his first year in with McCaffery on IR early in the season and only a WR1, Teddy Bridgewater and Mike Davis had career years and were the 21st offense in the league. 21st isn’t good. We all know that. But you had a backup QB, backup RB, and basically an entire offense devoid of talent everywhere including OLine except for your LT and one of your WR’s and still hung up over 350 pts for the season while the defense was Swiss cheese letting opponents hang up over 400.

That’s pretty dang good for an offense of nothing but 2 and 3rd stringers all season long minus two positions.
 
Last edited:
As a Jags fan I don’t think that Saints fans realize how bad Baalke was. The Jags situation was very unique. Loomis has done a horrible job over the past few years but he’s still leagues better than Baalke. Brady is overrated. So he was a good OC for the best college offense of all-time and a Josh Allen led offense. Big whoop

And yet he’s had more success than Coen and Glenn combined.
 
Yes indeed, the Carolina gig killed Joe Brady's career, it was that bad. Joe Brady failed David Tepper and Matt Rhule.

What could the Buffalo Bills have been thinking when less than 60 days after Brady was fired in Carolina, they hired him?

Joe Brady, one of the greatest comeback stories in NFL history.

I’m sorry but this doesn’t make sense. You should dig deeper into what happened in Carolina.
 
No competent organization with a consistent level of success would let a first time HC pick his own GM. It reeks of desperation, like giving up a king's ransom for a creepy qb.

It doesn't mean you shouldn't fire your current GM because he may be awful. But giving too much power to a HC who has never done his own job before is crazy.
 
He or his team? Mickey Mouse could OC Burrow throwing to the current best two WRs in the NFL, or to tell Josh Allen to be megatron.

He. He put up the best offense in college history. He then made an offense of 2nd and 3rd stringers who played all season long minus a couple of positions an average offense in Carolina. He then took over a top 5 QB with a struggling offense and made the QB debatedly MVP and a top 5 offense with average talent at WR, RB, TE and OLine.

Coen has had only 1 really good year as OC, and Glenn has never even put together a top 15 defense as DC.

And if Mickey Mouse could run a successful offense with Allen, why did the previous OC get fired and why was Allen a turnover machine under him? You can’t possibly look at Allen’s play last year compared to this year and think Brady had little to nothing to do with it.

Also there isn’t a QB anywhere in the world that wouldn’t jump at the idea of playing underneath Brady after how much Burrow and Allen have praised him for their development and successes.

Your talking about one guy, who 2 of the top 4 QBs in the NFL claim he either developed them or elevated them in their play greatly. And that’s not even including the career year Bridgewater had underneath him.
 
Last edited:
And yet he’s had more success than Coen and Glenn combined.
As of today, he has not been more successful than Glenn. Now, if they make it to the Super Bowl, yes. You forget the Lions were in the championship last year.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom