Offline
its crazy. Some people watch the video and say AK is in even more hot water now because of the video, some people watch it and say, well, it wasn't as bad as the initial report...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well isn't that what we're all here for....to post our thoughts?Twice you used the word "think" to try and make your point. Where is your evidence? I'm not saying you are wrong, but the video carries more weight than your feelings or assumptions.
its crazy. Some people watch the video and say AK is in even more hot water now because of the video, some people watch it and say, well, it wasn't as bad as the initial report...
I think people get into semantics here quite a bit… I don’t know how to quantify it but my feeling is that A LOT of people were excusing it as “a fight” or “it’s not his fault” or “the victim brought it in himself” kinda thing. And it’s ironic that right after your post is a great example of it.The dramatic "majority" comment may fit your narrative but it was hardly the case.
You think AK "instigated" the fight, where's your proof? All we see is the fight, who knows what happened prior based off the video.Twice you used the word "think" to try and make your point. Where is your evidence? I'm not saying you are wrong, but the video carries more weight than your feelings or assumptions.
Is that poster lying? I mean did you see AK stomping the "victim"? It was a fight and the guy that lost is wanting a payday. Now the individual in the hoodie who was moonwalking on his face, well that is way overboard. We don't know what happened prior to the video. We don't know what was said or done. Not saying it's an excuse, but sometimes dudes say things and get punched. Was it 10 mill punches, I wouldn't thinks so. I also won't be on the criminal or civil juries, so who knows.I think people get into semantics here quite a bit… I don’t know how to quantify it but my feeling is that A LOT of people were excusing it as “a fight” or “it’s not his fault” or “the victim brought it in himself” kinda thing. And it’s ironic that right after your post is a great example of it.
You think AK "instigated" the fight, where's your proof? All we see is the fight, who knows what happened prior based off the video.
i think more of a minority are excusng him, not majority (which A LOT can still be the minority). Just because most do not think he is going to do jail time does not mean we excuse him, Which is pretty much what the one who brought that is seems to think..I think people get into semantics here quite a bit… I don’t know how to quantify it but my feeling is that A LOT of people were excusing it as “a fight” or “it’s not his fault” or “the victim brought it in himself” kinda thing. And it’s ironic that right after your post is a great example of it.
Agreed. That's the big issue AK has. He's on the hook for the actions of the group. Now the DA might well use that as leverage to cut a plea deal that includes substantial consequences. This isn't a slam dunk for either side, so the legal teams on both sides need to proceed carefully.Whether Kamara actually kicked the victim, or merely landed a few shots then backed off, might mean something if you’re evaluating how to judge him as a human being.
But legally, in terms of committing battery resulting in substantial bodily harm, as a co-conspirator it makes no difference, he may as well have landed every blow and kick himself. In other words, assuming the conspiracy charge sticks, the state doesn't even have to prove Kamara landed x blow that caused the harm. He's equally responsible as everyone else involved (and they him).
That said, if Kamara can establish that his involvement wasn’t as egregious as the other defendants (or for example, he tried to call them off), it could theoretically make a difference in sentencing.
the last part can make a big difference if true.Whether Kamara actually kicked the victim, or merely landed a few shots then backed off, might mean something if you’re evaluating how to judge him as a human being. But legally, in terms of committing battery resulting in substantial bodily harm, as a co-conspirator it makes no difference, he may as well have landed every blow and kick himself. He's equally responsible.
That said, if Kamara can establish that his involvement wasn’t as egregious as the other defendants, it could theoretically make a difference in sentencing.
I figure you learn something new everyday. I always thought conspiracy was an agreement to commit a crime in the future. I guess that's why I was just a cop and not an attorney.
you seem to make good points for someone who is pretending to be a lawyer..It does have to be in the future, by definition. But that includes the immediate future. It's just two or more people agreeing to commit a crime (and in some jurisdictions, you don't even have to actually go through with it). It could be as simple as saying "let's rob this bank" or "let's give that guy a beat down".