Are you willing to get the Covid vaccine when offered? (6 Viewers)

[DaveXA]

So glad to see someone with common sense and open mindedness, to look beyond the censorship of the government.

You keep saying government censorship when it was never mandated. Good grief. It's a disingenuous statement on its face.

 

[Optimistic Ozzy]

I don't deny Ivermectin has it's uses, but it's not an anti-viral and would be useless vs Covid.

Sure, but what we shouldn't do is make up our own contrived "facts" based on conjecture or opinions of uninformed individuals or our own anecdotal experiences.

We would all do well to do due diligence and make sure our sources are legitimate experience and not faux self-described "experts".

Finally we agree. But how many "conspiracy theories" have been proven to the truthful?

 

[DaveXA]

Finally we agree. But how many "conspiracy theories" have been proven to the truthful?

None yet that I'm aware of.

 

[Optimistic Ozzy]

You keep saying government censorship when it was never mandated. Good grief. It's a disingenuous statement on its face.

Why in the heck do you keep jumbling my words? Did I say that the censorship was mandated? No, good grief.
I said that the FBI, DOJ, White House all but said, "might want to censor these comments". Good Grief

 

[WhoDatPhan78]

So we need government to decide what is information, and what is misinformation? No thanks.
We can do our own due diligence and decide for ourselves.

I wish we didn't but yes, we do.

People still believing that ivermectin is an effective treatment for covid is a perfect example of us not being responsible enough to not have some sort of government intervention when it comes to misinformation.

 

[Optimistic Ozzy]

None yet that I'm aware of.

Never mind

You keep saying government censorship when it was never mandated. Good grief. It's a disingenuous statement on its face.

Where did I say government censorship? Show me exactly where I said that.

 

[DaveXA]

Why in the heck do you keep jumbling my words? Did I say that the censorship was mandated? No, good grief.
I said that the FBI, DOJ, White House all but said, "might want to censor these comments". Good Grief

You called it government censorship. It's not. It's that simple.

So glad to see someone with common sense and open mindedness, to look beyond the censorship of the government.

 

[Optimistic Ozzy]

I wish we didn't but yes, we do.

People still believing that ivermectin is an effective treatment for covid is a perfect example of us not being responsible enough to not have some sort of government intervention when it comes to misinformation.

100% Total BS

 

[SaintInBucLand]

I don't deny Ivermectin has it's uses, but it's not an anti-viral and would be useless vs Covid.

I didn't intimate it was for anti-viral uses, but covid does cause inflammation in many parts of the body. And ivermectin has become known for it's anti-inflammatory properties, so it makes sense that an off label use could be warranted.

 

[Optimistic Ozzy]

You called it government censorship. It's not. It's that simple.

Indirect censorship. How's that?

 

[DaveXA]

Indirect censorship. How's that?

I would call it political influence. But indirect censorship works.

 

[WhoDatPhan78]

100% Total BS

I'm just going to pretend that you were saying that ivermectin being an effective treatment for covid is 100% BS.

 

[DaveXA]

I didn't intimate it was for anti-viral uses, but covid does cause inflammation in many parts of the body. And ivermectin has become known for it's anti-inflammatory properties, so it makes sense that an off label use could be warranted.

Sure, but very often, when I've heard people talk ivermectin it's in the context of Covid prevention. It won't prevent it at all. And the treatment is at best, to help reat symptoms, but it won't stop a Covid infection. A lot of people aren't aware that it's not an antiviral.

 

[Optimistic Ozzy]

I'm just going to pretend that you were saying that ivermectin being an effective treatment for covid is 100% BS

Sure, but very often, when I've heard people talk ivermectin it's in the context of Covid prevention. It won't prevent it at all. And the treatment is at best, to help reat symptoms, but it won't stop a Covid infection. A lot of people aren't aware that it's not an antiviral.

The dang vax and booster didn't prevent it, but it sure was broadcast that it did.

 

[SaintInBucLand]

Sure, but very often, when I've heard people talk ivermectin it's in the context of Covid prevention. It won't prevent it at all. And the treatment is at best, to help reat symptoms, but it won't stop a Covid infection. A lot of people aren't aware that it's not an antiviral.

I agree it's not for prevention but rather for treatment of the severe inflammation caused by covid. Covid has been found to not only cause inflammation in the respiratory system, but within other areas of the body as well, and ivermectin has become established with decades of use in helping stem inflammation.