- Joined
- May 3, 2012
- Messages
- 11,430
- Reaction score
- 23,621
Offline
I order an extra box of heavenly hash every year to put in the freezer. Best ice cream sandwich ever
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Saint I don’t go to the political board so haven’t seen you in a while. How’s the fam? Everything getting better?You don't know Elmer's Easter candy?
I'm so sorry. I hope they put some type of support for you in the relief bill.
Saint I don’t go to the political board so haven’t seen you in a while. How’s the fam? Everything getting better?
"Under the plan as it was being negotiated, individuals who earn $75,000 in adjusted gross income or less would get direct payments of $1,200 each, with married couples earning up to $150,000 receiving $2,400 -- and an additional $500 per each child. The payment would scale down by income, phasing out entirely at $99,000 for singles and $198,000 for couples without children."
Senate approves historic $2 trillion stimulus deal amid growing coronavirus fears
The Senate on Wednesday approved a historic, $2 trillion stimulus package to provide a jolt to an economy reeling from the coronavirus pandemic, capping days of intense negotiations that produced one of the most expensive and far-reaching measures Congress has ever considered.www.cnn.com
good here, except i am in my office. no forced home which is good and bad, driving down to DC and back tomorrow for work but not staying the night. 4 hours there and 4 hours back....I'm not there either. I just hang here and on the SSF these days.
Family is good, just enjoying the forced family time.How about you?
Based on income in what year? 2018? 2019? 2020? Are they going to spend time making the calculations first and then send the checks, which would seem to be inefficient? Or are they just going to send everyone the checks and then require repayment when taxes are filed next year? Past income would seem to be irrelevant to people who have lost or about to lose income in 2020.
I think it sucks because people making a little more than that have lost their jobsBased on income in what year? 2018? 2019? 2020? Are they going to spend time making the calculations first and then send the checks, which would seem to be inefficient? Or are they just going to send everyone the checks and then require repayment when taxes are filed next year? Past income would seem to be irrelevant to people who have lost or about to lose income in 2020.
I think it sucks because people making a little more than that have lost their jobs
Based on income in what year? 2018? 2019? 2020? Are they going to spend time making the calculations first and then send the checks, which would seem to be inefficient? Or are they just going to send everyone the checks and then require repayment when taxes are filed next year? Past income would seem to be irrelevant to people who have lost or about to lose income in 2020.
Don’t worry if they mess up it can all be corrected when you file your taxes next year!!This plan seems overly complicated and inefficient and not terribly reasonable as a means to their identified end
Not to mention people who may have made more in prior years than they make now because they either lost a job since then or went down to a single income. And a means test makes no sense if the point is in part to stimulate the economy.