Online
This post is correct in every particular.Raider fans were clear about Carr when he came to the Saints.
When he's good he can be very good. When he's bad, he's embarrassingly bad. They said he was a very polarizing QB for the fans.
When the Saints signed him, I said he was going to have to play far far better than he did as a Raider. The Raider-Carr games I watched, he threw dazzling passes and bonehead interceptions. My main takeaway for those years is that every game in the 4th quarter, the Raiders had 14 or 17 points. Not enough.
In 2023, we learned that he's poor in the red zone (career thing), and he lost his composure with emotions and poor decisions. In 2024, he gave us two perfect games to start the season against non-playoff teams. He missed 7 out of 16 games to injury. In games he played against 2024 playoff teams, the Saints lost them all, and look at the scoring output.
Eagles (12 points, Carr 1 TD pass)
Chiefs (13 points, 2 TD passes);
Rams (14 points, 1 TD pass)
If somebody wants to look at his games against 2023 playoff teams have at it.
Carr is a mid, not an above-mid QB. We got Raider Carr, not 'new-and-improved and can you at least remind us a little of Brees?' Carr. He's lifted no boats in 2 years. Keep him for another year because it's less cap-injuring.
Also, he's not a culture fit, not close. There's no "us against the world" emotion or level of play coming from him. We thrive on highly-self-motivated personas, like Drew, Alvin, Cam, Gardner-Johnson, Latt, Dom, and MT before the career ended.
Don't like me saying it? Here's a 2023 article from Underhill on Carr's career red-zone woes. I can only read the headline, but that's all I need. We trust Nick.
NewOrleans.Football
neworleans.football