TribuneUK
ALL-MADDEN TEAM
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2004
- Messages
- 7,178
- Reaction score
- 13,075
Offline
To be fair, there's a huge spectrum of ability between MT and TQS and to imply these are the two potential outcomes is rather misleading.I’ve seen this sentiment a lot, and I get it, but when you say “WR rich,” I think there are 3 or 4 guys who can become Michael Thomas, Deandre Hopkins, etc., and 20 guys who can be Tre’quan Smith. Which is fine. Receivers 3-6 on your depth chart are important. But if the team believes (like I do) that JJ is a perfect fit for us, has the potential to be a star, and values him coming in knowing the offense in a truncated offseason, I don’t have any problem jumping Philly to get him if he’s there in the late teens. And I know we signed Sanders, and that’s great, but it’s a 2-year deal for a 30+ year old receiver. And as a famous coach once said, the only thing better than a crawfish dinner is five crawfish dinners.
There are a stack of starter quality WR in this draft. There is a small top tier as there always is, but plenty of good players right behind them as well.