Loki Disney Plus - Trailer (2 Viewers)

This is an interesting take; however, since Charlie Cox is playing Matt Murdock in the upcoming Spiderman film, it seems like it's jumping to conclusions to say Feige is attempting to erase the Marvel TV story lines.
Well he is because while he's playing Daredevil nothing from the Netflix series is carrying over.
 
Business definitely picked up by the end of episode 2. The ending spot made sense, but it was one of those WandaVision ending moments that left you wanting more IMMEDIATELY. Easy to see how we could end up with the Multiverse after the Loki Variant's plan went into motion.
 
I like how in episode 2, if you caught it, they gave you a little bit of foreshadowing of a major villain to come.
 
I don't think The Variant is actually Loki. I suspect it's really The Enchantress. It may be that The Enchantress is a Loki variant in the MCU, but I think they are throwing us a little misdirect at this point.
 
I don't think The Variant is actually Loki. I suspect it's really The Enchantress. It may be that The Enchantress is a Loki variant in the MCU, but I think they are throwing us a little misdirect at this point.
Yeah, her appearance at the end made me wonder if that was really her or the "bad" Loki variant in disguise. I don't recall ever seeing her, so I didn't know who she was.
 
The locations listed at the end. Some familiar places listed
  • March 31, 1492: Lisbon, Portugal
  • April 23, 2301: Vormir
  • October 25, 1551: Thorton, USA
  • November 22, 1999: Cookeville, USA
  • February 16, 2004: Asgard
  • October 3, 1390: Rome, Italy
  • August 13, 1984: Sakaar, Tayo
  • February 2, 1808: Barichara, Colombia
  • July 14, 1708: Porvoo, Finland
  • December 22, 1382: Ego
  • October 13, 1982: Titan
  • September 21, 1947: New York, USA
  • March 1, 1984: Tokyo, Japan
  • January 3, 0051: Hala
  • April 2, 1999: Kingsport, USA
  • September 24, 1001: Xandar
  • November 23, 2065: Bejing, China
  • July 18, 1903: Madrid, Spain
April 4, 1887: ???
 
The locations listed at the end. Some familiar places listed
  • March 31, 1492: Lisbon, Portugal
  • April 23, 2301: Vormir
  • October 25, 1551: Thorton, USA
  • November 22, 1999: Cookeville, USA
  • February 16, 2004: Asgard
  • October 3, 1390: Rome, Italy
  • August 13, 1984: Sakaar, Tayo
  • February 2, 1808: Barichara, Colombia
  • July 14, 1708: Porvoo, Finland
  • December 22, 1382: Ego
  • October 13, 1982: Titan
  • September 21, 1947: New York, USA
  • March 1, 1984: Tokyo, Japan
  • January 3, 0051: Hala
  • April 2, 1999: Kingsport, USA
  • September 24, 1001: Xandar
  • November 23, 2065: Bejing, China
  • July 18, 1903: Madrid, Spain
April 4, 1887: ???
Where did you see this list? I must have missed it.
 
Episode 2: 7 min of good writing, the rest, meaningless crap. The character of Loki is the only thing holding this show up, I understand they have stripped him down from what he was, into order to grow him into something different, that's fine, story arcs do that all the time, but the whole TVA (which is nothing more then Men in Black) sucks in every way, the entertaining part is watching them get their arse kicked at every turn.
 
Where did you see this list? I must have missed it.
Found the written out list on the website, but if we're talking about on the actual show it was

On the TVA monitors showing the branching timeline towards the end. It was a quick flash.

I tried posting a picture but I couldn't get it to stay within the spoilers so I took it off.
 
My wife caught it, but I missed it
Did anyone else catch the 7 (movie) reference in the library?

lots of Loki/Mobius comparisons so far

check out the hunters/analysts propaganda poster right at the beginning of the credits
 
I don't think The Variant is actually Loki. I suspect it's really The Enchantress. It may be that The Enchantress is a Loki variant in the MCU, but I think they are throwing us a little misdirect at this point.

Especially with the "headband" and the blonde hair, I thought she very much had the look of the Enchantress from the comics, so this makes all kinds of sense. (imdb.com lists her merely as "The Variant")
I would say her appearance here is better evidence for the narrative that the MCU is choosing to ignore the previous TV material since the Enchantress appeared on AoS along with Lady Sif.
Of course, if she's a variant from a different timeline, what happened on AoS wouldn't matter, though.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom