Rattler's Jump Pass (8 Viewers)

[lapaz]

You can say this for just about EVERY rookie quarterback that has stepped foot on an NFL field. Sounds like you’re talking about Jordan Love as a rookie, and many others. Mind you, up to just recently Jordan Love was one of the leading QBs in the interception category. Young QBs have all sorts of issues even beyond their rookie season. I tell you what: go back and look at Drew Brees during his rookie year, then copy and paste what you said about Rattler. It’ll be spot on. Rattler is simply learning his lessons like everyone else before him, all of which will be helpful as he continues to develop in the NFL.

Most do, but most did much better in college, so we have a sense they can do it. I grant that most QBs struggle their first year, so Rattler may come around. I disagree about Drew. He didn’t have the same problems, but I understand he is exceptional. I just read lots of excuses about the surrounding cast, yet Carr and Haener have essentially had the same cast, yet most people don’t give them that latitude. Taysom and the olinemen have been hurt most of the season. Rattler has good traits and he may develop, but for every QB that have these problems and do solve them, there are 10 or more that don’t. In the meantime, Carr is far and away the best we have today.

 

[TenTwo]

This comment is wrong!
He could have put 20 more yards on it and the deep DB would have intercepted it.
Rattler has a strong arm... it had nothing to do with the INT.
He threw into double coverage that was executed extremely well by the Packer's...

What was disappointing about the play was there wasn't a underneath route that would have kept the low DB from getting involved in the coverage of Foster...
Rattler's mistake is he didn't recognize the double coverage!

Which is a rookie mistake!

Wrong? Watch it again. The DB is underneath with a safety over top. If Rattler leads Moreau to the back pilon, the DB who picks his pass is out of the play.

 

[MikeyF]

Wrong? Watch it again. The DB is underneath with a safety over top. If Rattler leads Moreau to the back pilon, the DB who picks his pass is out of the play.

The INT happened because he threw into double coverage...
not because he weak armed it!

As I stated earlier, I don't understand not running an underneath route to take away the CB...

 

[TenTwo]

The INT happened because he threw into double coverage...
not because he weak armed it!

As I stated earlier, I don't understand not running an underneath route to take away the CB...

Watch the clip again. I think he threw into double coverage BECAUSE he weak armed it. Watch Foster running. He's heading to the back of the end zone.

 

[MikeyF]

Yeah I'm not sure. The follow up pass looked a little like maybe he doesn't have the arm he needs at this level. It looked like he could have put ten more yards on the throw and hit Foster for a TD

2024 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Spencer Rattler – WalterFootball

walterfootball.com

 

[TruSaint]

He had it against the chargers and couldn’t do anything. He’s a 5th round pick. This may be the only shot he ever gets.

You mean 1 single game where he split reps with Haener? That’s what we’re basing this on?

 

[Saint Greg]

You mean 1 single game where he split reps with Haener? That’s what we’re basing this on?

“Split reps” you mean he was benched.

 

[TruSaint]

“Split reps” you mean he was benched.

By an inept coaching staff, what a great way to let a rookie build his confidence, bench him half way through, then do the same thing and start heaner and bench him half way thru, which not to mention rattler came in and looked great and gave this pathetic offense a spark. If you think rattler is the issue and not our issues and joke of a front office and coaching staff you don’t know ball.

 

[TruSaint]

“Split reps” you mean he was benched.

Like you do realize the stuff I am telling you about Rattler is coming to me first hand from some players and some personnel right? This is not my opinion, these are things stated to me.

I just wanna make sure there's 0 confusion, you think Rattler is part of the problem, yes?

 

[kcirdor]

By an inept coaching staff, what a great way to let a rookie build his confidence, bench him half way through, then do the same thing and start heaner and bench him half way thru, which not to mention rattler came in and looked great and gave this pathetic offense a spark. If you think rattler is the issue and not our issues and joke of a front office and coaching staff you don’t know ball.

I guess 47% looks "great"... he was assisted by 3 roughing the passer calls and a couple defensive holdings on drive killing plays, a dropped pick and an extra play in regulation. But that extra 7% completion really made him look great i guess.

 

[TruSaint]

I guess 47% looks "great"... he was assisted by 3 roughing the passer calls and a couple defensive holdings on drive killing plays, a dropped pick and an extra play in regulation. But that extra 7% completion really made him look great i guess.

Are you trying to say he didnt play well? That is your qualification that makes Rattler part of the problem? People that go off stats are hilarious.

I swear the avg IQ on here drops daily.

ill go crawl back into my hole now and not post again on here for awhile, usually when i do its a waste of time. see yall in a few months

 

[kcirdor]

Are you trying to say he didnt play well? That is your qualification that makes Rattler part of the problem? People that go off stats are hilarious.

I swear the avg IQ on here drops daily.

ill go crawl back into my hole now and not post again on here for awhile, usually when i do its a waste of time. see yall in a few months

Nope, just refuting you saying he looked "great". IQ?...... yea... ok, buddy. You go cry in your hole... cause no one gives a sheet. I love the "You don't know ball " line.

 

[TruSaint]

Nope, just refuting you saying he looked "great". IQ?...... yea... ok, buddy. You go cry in your hole... cause no one gives a sheet. I love the "You don't know ball " line.

you know saying you dont give a sheet but replying means you do give a sheet enough to reply. low iq.

 

[kcirdor]

you know saying you dont give a sheet but replying means you do give a sheet enough to reply. low iq.

no, it means no on gives a sheet about you going away... so there is no need to announce it... you ever see someone announce they are leaving Facebook? no one cares. watching you make up sheet just to try and claim "stupid" is pretty damn ironic... you claimed Rattler looked great. he didn't. He had a ton of help from the refs. That is all i refuted and now you are trying to lump me in with whoever the hell you were arguing with before... hilarious.

 

[TruSaint]

no, it means no on gives a sheet about you going away... so there is no need to announce it... you ever see someone announce they are leaving Facebook? no one cares. watching you make up sheet just to try and claim "stupid" is pretty damn ironic... you claimed Rattler looked great. he didn't. He had a ton of help from the refs. That is all i refuted and now you are trying to lump me in with whoever the hell you were arguing with before... hilarious.

you give a sheet enough to mention you dont give a sheet, implying you do. It's ok to not be smart you know? Contradiction is difficult for you to grasp, i get it.

I fact that i have to explain that what i mean by rattler looks great is that i mean compared to what we offered before he came onto the field and the tools he had to work with shows me all i need to know about your reading comprehension skills. Tom Brady is great, grilled cheese is great, there are different levels, the fact that you just took the term and generalized it is hilarious.