Breaking! Saints fired Dennis Allen (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I heard all of everything. But if we kick a FG and beat Carolina, then the mutiny magically disappears. Amazing how a kickers leg can change events in time. I wish I had a leg like that. What’s going on here, is people are trying to cope, so they are searching high and low for cracks, where there are none. People’s nature is to pile on. Mine too. But no, kick the FG and change history. According to the rumors, the lockerorrom was lost last year, and by default, still lost this year. The same locker room that destroyed Carolina and Dallas. I Remeber in those days watching like 10 different player podcasts. Everyone was happy.

Sorry man but if you look at all the reports on this, DA might have been fired even if they beat Carolina. Gayle Benson has been communicating with players for two weeks on this issue. It's not an issue that suddenly popped up after losing to Carolina. It seems clear he lost the locker room at the end of last year. I think he then more or less won them back over the offseason and with a better training camp. But after the long losing streak, it became clear to the players that the issues they had with him before were still there.

I think DA is a good defensive coach. But ironically despite all the people calling him a Beta Male, I think by nature he is an old school football coach. Problem is that he tried to emulate what Payton did and that isn't his personality. The players saw through it and could tell he wasn't being who he was. I do think all the personal attacks on him and Loomis are over the top. But, DA clearly was not getting the job done and lost the team. And Loomis showed poor judgment and/or an inability to overcome personal attachments in failing to see the obvious for 1 1/2 years.

That's poor judgment and makes me question whether he can still do the GM job. I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt given that he had begun to clean up the cap, stopped always trading up, and actually had a deal in place to trade down in the draft. But the fact that Gayle Benson had to go over his head to fire DA makes me seriously question if he can change enough to still do the job. Sometimes guys just get burned out and you need to bring in new blood.
 
OK? It just seemed like you were calling a lot of this stuff theories and rumors when there is some pretty solid reporting and first hand accounts about what happened.

But, whatever - we got Loomis out here in public going on about PARKING SPOTS. It's fine.

To be fair, Duncan is a hoe and that article about the parking spots was dumb. BUT, Loomis should not be focusing or worried about that. He should have been focused on the players wanting his head coach fired, his head coach totally mismanaging the end of both halves of the Carolina game (a pattern for him) and he should have been doing what Gayle Benson was doing.

I have always been willing to give Loomis the benefit of the doubt and I understand Loomis not throwing his friend under the bus after he was fired. But, he needed to admit that DA had to be fired because he could not overcome the adversity of the injuries and simply was not winning enough games instead of complaining about a dumb Jeff Duncan article.
 
Right on. If people are wanting to hate ML, go at it from his cap management style, not his loyalty to his people. But I’ll be real here. His style never pissed anyone off until recently. When Drew and Sean left. He did take a controversial gamble with Carr. (Something I agreed with at the time). With the assumption that we were in a winning window. But now is a new day, and it’s clear that we’re not in the winning window anymore. Does he try and kick the can while he’s in a losing window? If he does, then his sanity should be questioned. But apparently he’s not, we traded Latt yesterday. (He got a little fleeced on that deal, we should’ve gotten a second, but it was at the deadline, so there’s that.). We should cut ML a break, and ride this out with Rizzi. I’m sure ML will hire a new HC if Rizzi doesn’t win the last 6 games in a row. If Rizzi can he deserves to be HC, imo.
I agree with the vast majority of this post. But I don't think we got fleeced on the Lattimore trade. Two undeniable things about Lattimore was evident before getting shipped to Washington. First, no one can deny the greatness that he brought to the position. But alas, his best years seem to be behind him. We got the picks that we did simply because there was still enough value in the young man for one of the 'all in' teams to take a shot at upgrading that corner position. Marshon still does that. However...

The bigger issue is whether he can ever overcome the rash of injuries we've seen from him in recent years, particularly the recurring tweaks of his hamstring. Some seem to feel that his injuries were of the 'business decision' variety. But if that was really the issue that kept him from being 'available' to play (particularly after signing a huge contract), then this is not a good look for a professional player, and it would give even more reason for wanting to cut ties with such a player.

But I truly don't believe that Lattimore was feigning an injury. Instead I believe that Washington realized his past (and current) propensity for ripping up his hammy and considered his history when making their play for him. He is literally heading to the Commanders straight off of our injury list. I really do wish him well and will miss his outstanding performances when he's on the field. But he is simply the most logical start to the list of upheavals that are coming within the next year or two. It HAS to happen in order to start writing a new chapter for the Saints. Money rules the league.
 
Its weird that I said loss to ATL because we won that game, but I guess in hindsigh it registred as a loss because of how things went down.

I noticed that and I was thinking the same thing. We won that game by a lot, but it felt like a loss after what went down at the end and with DA apologizing.
 
Yeah, AK really looked like he did as a young player in that game. And that was despite a career high in touches.
I've always believed Alvin was still on par. He probably doesn't have quite the leg drive he did on younger legs, but he's still got his unworldly balance and he was never a speed merchant. He's also incredibly smart for a RB in how he see's defenses which makes him dangerous in the passing game on option routes. In fact, food for thought.

Last year, Juwan Johnson was supposed to take the next step, and that revolved around him being utilized w/ more option routes. Remember, Carr was supposed to be friendly to TE's. Last year, Juwan didn't take that step.

So here's a curious question. Why was Juwan Johnson the target on an option route on that final play and not Kamara? We could look at our OC and say perhaps bad playcall and yet I've got to think the HC maybe say something like "give me somethign to Kamara here" and Kubiak under the guidance of his HC makes the call right?

IDK, lots of questions, not a lot of answers. Allen wasn't good enough and that's all it boils down to.
 
Former Saint, James Hurst believes Allen lost the team after he took them to task for the Williams TD from victory formation at the end of the Atlanta game last season.

Apparently that’s when players started chattering amongst themselves.
I totally can see this. A lot of fans took issue with his pathetic apology, so it's not surprising players felt the same way.
 
I've always believed Alvin was still on par. He probably doesn't have quite the leg drive he did on younger legs, but he's still got his unworldly balance and he was never a speed merchant. He's also incredibly smart for a RB in how he see's defenses which makes him dangerous in the passing game on option routes. In fact, food for thought.

Last year, Juwan Johnson was supposed to take the next step, and that revolved around him being utilized w/ more option routes. Remember, Carr was supposed to be friendly to TE's. Last year, Juwan didn't take that step.

So here's a curious question. Why was Juwan Johnson the target on an option route on that final play and not Kamara? We could look at our OC and say perhaps bad playcall and yet I've got to think the HC maybe say something like "give me somethign to Kamara here" and Kubiak under the guidance of his HC makes the call right?

IDK, lots of questions, not a lot of answers. Allen wasn't good enough and that's all it boils down to.

I do wonder how much of the overly conservative play calling at times was due to DA telling Kubiak what he wanted. I know that Kubiak was conservative with the Vikings, which was blame on Zimmer, but we have seen the same thing here. I wonder how much of that is his philosophy and how much of it is DA or just a lack of personnel?

I do like what Kubiak has done with the run game when the OL is at least partially healthy, but I haven't been impressed with the lack of motion, lack of play action, and lack of inventiveness in the passing game. And I don't think he did a good job of calling plays or scheming for Rattler after his first start. I thought the plan was particularly bad against the Chargers.

Although I do think he did a good job against Carolina other that the 4th down fade. I know Carr's first read was Johnson on the option route, but I don't get a 30 yard fade even being in the read progression in that situation. Anway, yes it seems like whatever play the ran, AK should have been the guy they were trying to get the ball to in that situation.
 
Yup, it's actually one of the few things they've done recently I agree with....AK41 is not your typical aging RB.....

It does look like he may be another Adrian Peterson who can play at a high level at a much older age. I do think it's a risk, but he's the only real playmaker this team has right now outside of the deep ball to Shaheed.
 
DA was the conservstive philosophy, that is certain. So many games lost in the final minutes because we suddenly switch to zone or start playing soft and the offense just protecting the ball.. it was Mora 2.0 minus Mora's passion.
 
So here's a curious question. Why was Juwan Johnson the target on an option route on that final play and not Kamara? We could look at our OC and say perhaps bad playcall and yet I've got to think the HC maybe say something like "give me somethign to Kamara here" and Kubiak under the guidance of his HC makes the call right?

IDK, lots of questions, not a lot of answers. Allen wasn't good enough and that's all it boils down to.

Kamara was doubled, Johnson had inside leverage and was open past the sticks, and the pocket was clean. I am pretty certain Wilson's route was primarily to clear out to keep the safeties back. Watching the play, the design looks pretty damn good for Johnson as the primary read. He was open and the amount of green in front of him was substantial.

Carr simply decided to throw a jump ball to a guy with no separation.

4th and 4.png
 
I agree with the vast majority of this post. But I don't think we got fleeced on the Lattimore trade. Two undeniable things about Lattimore was evident before getting shipped to Washington. First, no one can deny the greatness that he brought to the position. But alas, his best years seem to be behind him. We got the picks that we did simply because there was still enough value in the young man for one of the 'all in' teams to take a shot at upgrading that corner position. Marshon still does that. However...

The bigger issue is whether he can ever overcome the rash of injuries we've seen from him in recent years, particularly the recurring tweaks of his hamstring. Some seem to feel that his injuries were of the 'business decision' variety. But if that was really the issue that kept him from being 'available' to play (particularly after signing a huge contract), then this is not a good look for a professional player, and it would give even more reason for wanting to cut ties with such a player.

But I truly don't believe that Lattimore was feigning an injury. Instead I believe that Washington realized his past (and current) propensity for ripping up his hammy and considered his history when making their play for him. He is literally heading to the Commanders straight off of our injury list. I really do wish him well and will miss his outstanding performances when he's on the field. But he is simply the most logical start to the list of upheavals that are coming within the next year or two. It HAS to happen in order to start writing a new chapter for the Saints. Money rules the league.
I believe its both. I too don't agree that he's selfish all the time and only makes business decisions because how could he sit out of Carolina. He wouldn't. So imo, he must've been legit injured. Missing training camp is more diva like. Aaron Rogers missed Mandatory mini camp for example. So theres an element of that too. When he pulls himself out like he did vs Denver, then that was a business decision. And a good business decision. Something a good coach should do, when your team is getting destroyed, pull your starters at some point. My whole issue with the tear it down and reset, is that its a 3 year plan not an offseseon like some are trying to fool themselves into beleiving. ML is the best qualifired to navigate us out of this situaion, a situation that we for the most part all agredd too, "kicking the can" as opposed to a new GM w/no knowedge of ML intent and plan. Thats why its important not to jump to conclusions about if theres tension between GB and ML. Let the facts play out on that issue first, imo.
 
DA was the conservstive philosophy, that is certain. So many games lost in the final minutes because we suddenly switch to zone or start playing soft and the offense just protecting the ball.. it was Mora 2.0 minus Mora's passion.

It is funny though because people went ballistic about losing the Philly game because he played man on Philly's last drive which led to the Keystone Cops moment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom