- Joined
- Jul 8, 2000
- Messages
- 28,005
- Reaction score
- 60,620
- Age
- 45
Offline
I'm not saying Radunz is a great player but to rank him because he played on the team with the worst record is kind of off base. How many good to great players played on horrible teams? I can probably name at least 50
I am in fact NOT ranking him based on who he played for. I am ranking him based on his play, but also making the point to the person I quoted that merely playing doesn’t enhance JAG status. I added the fact that he was playing with the worst team in the league only for added emphasis.
At the end of the day though, it’s all semantics. Clearly that poster has a different definition of JAG than I do.
To me, there are many JAGs starting in the league - competent decent enough players but aren’t going to do much to enhance your team, lineup fillers, average to slightly below average types.
Maybe the staff envisions him developing into something greater, but as of right now, based on his current body of work, he fits the JAG definition above and is someone I’d envision us wanting to upgrade eventually.
That said, I’m not going to pretend that I’ve been sitting at home watching behind the LOS 2024 Tennessee Titans cut-ups for days and grading Radunz. Like everyone else, I am just going based on reputation, anecdotal evidence, pressures/sacks allowed data, including the somewhat phony PFF information as well as things being said by the media regarding his play. Hopefully he proves me wrong and ends up being a find.
Last edited: