DSnfla
ALL-MADDEN TEAM
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2005
- Messages
- 6,817
- Reaction score
- 8,618
Online
Ok back up your statement as to why.FTR… I hope they do NOT hire Glenn. He’s gonna fail
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok back up your statement as to why.FTR… I hope they do NOT hire Glenn. He’s gonna fail
Exactly, he's just blowing smoke, like he always doesI don't know where you get the idea that Loomis hires puppets. Both Payton and Allen were given a wide berth in both coaching staff decision-making and player personnel. Rizzi was the interim coach, so he wasn't put in a position of making personnel decisions. Had Rizzi been hired as the permanent coach, then Rizzi would have been given the reins. The puppet comment has no basis in fact.
LOL it was reported by Underhill that he felt that Loomis was going to fire Allen at the end of the season. It was not THE firing of Allen that Loomis disagreed with it was the MID-SEASON firing he disagreed with, it's not a good look for the franchise . Loomis nor Tom Benson were fans of firing a HC mid-season. Loomis said himself that the firing of Allen was a CONSENSUS with Mrs B and himselfBreer reported that Loomis wasnt ready to fire Allen and that it was Gayles decision. Nowhere did Allen or Loomis say at the time that Loomis told Allen he disagreed with the decision. Or did Loomis say he disagreed with it. It was a report. Not a verbal confirmation from 1 of the 2 people in the room. You did get 2 likes for that bit of misinformation though.
Its different hearing if from the guy who was fired, that he was told that Loomis didnt agree with it. Basically, "Gayle told me to do it, but I dont agree with it". I dont know how that doesnt make Gayle look somewhat bad here. A subordinate, or if we dont like that word for Loomis, an employee questioning her decision to the guy she was firing.
That's just not correct. HC candidates are looking for an organization that will give them EVERY chance to succeed. Firing a HC mid-season is not a good look , very much like firing a HC after 1 seasonWe can agree that we werent any better after the DA firing than before, outside of a lot of yelling in the Atlanta game. But it needed to happen when it happened. Goes back to the poor roster Loomis has assembled and the cap and draft mistakes he has made. But I know you will refuse to accept this is largely Loomis' fault.
No potential coach in their right mind is going to respect an organization more or less for firing a guy on a 7 game losing streak, who was 18-25 with the Saints and 26-53 overall. It might even speak to a franchise who wont accept failure. At that point there was a lot of rumblings about players losing their minds with Allen. At least they seemed to wanted to play for Rizzi, despite the results not changing much.
I dont think it matters one single iota to a potential HC that we fired the last 1 mid season. None.
Or an offense that runs the ball well and controls TOP , keeping the ball away from the offense and making them go on long drives and less amount of drives to scoreMy only issue w/ Glenn is he’s bringing over DAs scheme, and while on one end AG has proven he’s willing to blitz more than Allen, his defense still is more bend don’t break while forcing turnovers.
That type of defense needs to be complimented w/ an offense that’s capable of scoring quickly and regularly so that he other team has to pass the ball more.
FWIW Glen also started incorporating early down blitzes, something I wish DA/Woods would have done this year. It would have helped in the run game instead of letting the RBs attack the LOS and then attempting to corral the runner after they’ve picked up speed.
So I guess he’s innovated that defense, so I kind of just quelled my own thoughts. I’d be curious about who his OC will be.
The way Ben Johnson gets #’s in the run game is a thing of beauty. Didn’t see that type of scheming and design in Kubiak’s system despite Detroit also running Wide Zone concepts.
Glenn is warming on me though.
Ordinarily that's true, but the team had lost 7 straight games with an embarrassingly bad loss at the end of it. Fans and players alike were at their wit's end and it was time. Gayle stepping in was the correct thing to do and there's no doubt the coaches interviewing for the position understand what went down and why it did, so I don't think it's going to affect their decision making.That's just not correct. HC candidates are looking for an organization that will give them EVERY chance to succeed. Firing a HC mid-season is not a good look , very much like firing a HC after 1 season
I think the only real benefit firing DA mid season was that we got to get a look at Rizzi and Young as DL coach . And we got rid of Grantham. It never looks good as an organization to fire a HC mid-season and RARELY makes a differenceOrdinarily that's true, but the team had lost 7 straight games with an embarrassingly bad loss at the end of it. Fans and players alike were at their wit's end and it was time. Gayle stepping in was the correct thing to do and there's no doubt the coaches interviewing for the position understand what went down and why it did, so I don't think it's going to affect their decision making.
I do think maybe some other issues might cause a candidate to turn down the job, but what happened with Allen isn't one of them.
I would say the HC and cap situation is his doing, but he doesn't pick the coaching staff or players. He's never done that while GM.
I mean, as a rule I normally would agree, but this was the exception because of how much discontent there was. I would add that in addition to the benefits you mentioned, I believe Gayle pushing the issue spurred Loomis into getting his ducks in a row for interviews. It seems like they're doing their due diligence this time around.I think the only real benefit firing DA mid season was that we got to get a look at Rizzi and Young as DL coach . And we got rid of Grantham. It never looks good as an organization to fire a HC mid-season and RARELY makes a difference
That's just not correct. HC candidates are looking for an organization that will give them EVERY chance to succeed. Firing a HC mid-season is not a good look , very much like firing a HC after 1 season
In the context of building the team, yes. He does a lot more than that behind the scenes, sure.Youre telling me that you think Loomis picks the head coach, and manages the cap and thats it?
Aside from the HC, correct. I'm sure he's involved with some other staffing decisions i.e. the scouting department, training, etc but I'm speaking more towards the coaching staff and player personnel.He doesn’t pick the staff, the players or the draft picks.
The buck stops with him in regards to the terms of trades, compensation and such, but the HC is the primary driver of proposing trade ideas.He doesn’t make the bone headed draft trades.
In the context of building the team, yes. He does a lot more than that behind the scenes, sure.
Aside from the HC, correct. I'm sure he's involved with some other staffing decisions i.e. the scouting department, training, etc but I'm speaking more towards the coaching staff and player personnel.
The buck stops with him in regards to the terms of trades, compensation and such, but the HC is the primary driver of proposing trade ideas.
Do you not pay attention to what respected reporters on the Saints say? Or to what ML says himself ??? Loomis is pretty much hands off on coaching staff , players AND who we pick. He has said himself when it comes to the draft is a CONSENSUS and when there is a disagreement he's the tie breaker. It's not like the HC and the scouting dept can't come to an agreement and ML says I'm going to draft someone totally different. And you can bet when the HC and the scouting dept disagree ML will mostly side with the HC he did with SP.Youre telling me that you think Loomis picks the head coach, and manages the cap and thats it? He doesn’t pick the staff, the players or the draft picks. He doesn’t make the bone headed draft trades.