Sean "Diddy" Combs houses were raided by Feds (Update: Diddy charged) (1 Viewer)

Then why keep arguing Epstein and secret famous music people orgies wild speculation in a Diddy thread?
Because I have suspicions and some unanswered questions regarding Epstein's death, the timing, and how the nature of his death was called into question, Guido. I can't prove it with any hard, convincing evidence but subjectively, cases like these makes me feel like something's rotten or being covered up. You don't necessarily know where or how but there are some gaps that give the impression not all of the truth is being told.


Again, I can't prove these things in a court of law and suspicion doesn't convict anyone much less warrants any charges being field, but I think I'm allowed to have suspicions, Guido. Another poster mentioned Diddy "getting Epsteined" and the quote kind of brought back some of the controversy surrounding his fall from grace, his powerful connections, his "Little Black Book" and how a few of the questions surrounding his death didnt seem to add up. Chuck mentioned what "getting Epsteined" meant and I thought that was a good opportunity to tell him what I had heard about some of those conspiracies involved.
 
I once said hello to Patton Oswald at the 4 seasons in Austin. If he's ever embroiled in a pedo scandal, do I need to worry about being thrown in jail and 'suicided'?
Did you have any long-winded, interesting conversations about his life and career? Did you know him on a personal basis for many years where he mightve told you things he wouldn't let on to others? Were you a close, personal, trusted friend of Patton?

I don't think you have anything to worry about. I think the Original Golden State Killer who was arrested several years ago who committed multiple rapes and murders in California back in the 70's likely got to know and meet more of the real Patton Oswald since his now-deceased former wife, a crime writer and author, wrote a book detailing Original.Golden State's Killer crimes before her death and Oswald met and talked to him in prison at length after they caught him several years ago.
 
good lord can you go post epstein stuff in an epstein thread before this one gets closed since epstein has absolutely zero to do with diddy getting arrested. try to stay on topic
I didn't bring it up, Jay. Someone else did. Chuck asked what that term "getting Epsteined" meant and I told him what the whole conspiracy theory surrounding that term meant and I explained to him that I had some unanswered questions surrounding his death or the nature of it.
 
Did you have any long-winded, interesting conversations about his life and career? Did you know him on a personal basis for many years where he mightve told you things he wouldn't let on to others? Were you a close, personal, trusted friend of Patton?

I don't think you have anything to worry about. I think the Original Golden State Killer who was arrested several years ago who committed multiple rapes and murders in California back in the 70's likely got to know and meet more of the real Patton Oswald since his now-deceased former wife, a crime writer and author, wrote a book detailing Original.Golden State's Killer crimes before her death and Oswald met and talked to him in prison at length after they caught him several years ago.
You seem to have missed my point. You cannot assume because people have met and had conversations that they are involved in criminal enterprises together.

SC500 was saying that as well when he said, there's no proof. If you are unfamiliar with proof, it's what is needed for a successful trial. It's become pretty popular to try things on the interwebz and in media. Fortunately, neither of those options hold up in a real court. You can actually get in a bit of trouble for insisting something without proof. Ask Fox about how that Dominion case worked out for em.
 
Because I have suspicions and some unanswered questions regarding Epstein's death, the timing, and how the nature of his death was called into question, Guido. I can't prove it with any hard, convincing evidence but subjectively, cases like these makes me feel like something's rotten or being covered up. You don't necessarily know where or how but there are some gaps that give the impression not all of the truth is being told.


Again, I can't prove these things in a court of law and suspicion doesn't convict anyone much less warrants any charges being field, but I think I'm allowed to have suspicions, Guido. Another poster mentioned Diddy "getting Epsteined" and the quote kind of brought back some of the controversy surrounding his fall from grace, his powerful connections, his "Little Black Book" and how a few of the questions surrounding his death didnt seem to add up. Chuck mentioned what "getting Epsteined" meant and I thought that was a good opportunity to tell him what I had heard about some of those conspiracies involved.
Be suspicious all you want about Epstein- plenty to be suspicious about
But what you’re doing seems speculative guilt many association and that association seems that the other people are famous- either for music or politics

It’s a bit tinfoil hatty
 
You seem to have missed my point. You cannot assume because people have met and had conversations that they are involved in criminal enterprises together.

SC500 was saying that as well when he said, there's no proof. If you are unfamiliar with proof, it's what is needed for a successful trial. It's become pretty popular to try things on the interwebz and in media. Fortunately, neither of those options hold up in a real court. You can actually get in a bit of trouble for insisting something without proof. Ask Fox about how that Dominion case worked out for em.
Oh, I didnt miss your point and Ive said there's no solid, consequential evidence suggesting anything nefarious happened or occured. I'm not insisting anything happened at all other then I have some private suspicions or a few unanswered questions. Just airing some suspicions that I may have isn't against the law and I will give Chuck a lot of credit, he has answered quite a few of those questions.

Fox didn't like the result of a certain event and kept whining about it like spoiled brat kids and it lead them getting sued. They deserved what they got.
 
Last edited:
Be suspicious all you want about Epstein- plenty to be suspicious about
But what you’re doing seems speculative guilt many association and that association seems that the other people are famous- either for music or politics

It’s a bit tinfoil hatty
Well, you can rest easy, I'm not a tinfoil Info Wars conspiracy theory nut but I do question some things or issues when they don't seem to add up.

I'll give credit to SC500 in that he's answered a good deal of those questions or suspicions I previously had.
 
dude's going under the jail

Yeah they took their time - I think we can expect the case to be very strong.*











*Fine print: In the United States all criminal-charge defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty by trial verdict or admission by plea of guilt. Allegations contained in indictments are not statements of fact but claims made by the government. The burden of proof is upon the prosecution. Void where prohibited
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom