- Joined
- Feb 24, 2010
- Messages
- 15,139
- Reaction score
- 26,653
- Age
- 50
Offline
Fair enough, I just think if the parity continues the homestate advantage the SEC traditionally enjoys may be in danger. When I say home state I mean if LSU can secure 85-90 percent of in-state top recruits, they can field a top-tier team because of the amount of homegrown talent. The same goes for states like Georgia and Florida, however, if the money starts flowing in other places, their advantage may be undercut.I just disagree when they say that. There is no proof to say that the southern schools do not have the funding or at least cannot come up with enough funding.
As of December 2024 here are the NIL Collective funding per NCAA
Texas $22.2M
Ohio State $20.2M
LSU $20.1M
Georgia $18.3M
Texas A&M $17.2M
Michigan $16.3M
Alabama $15.9M
Florida $15.9M
Clemson$15.2M
I mean the southern schools seem to be doing pretty well with NIL funding. SMU is a private school so they are not required to list funding, which means they are not required to be listed on list like this.