Offline
Personal success, freedom, fulfilment is a bad thing? Call me crazy
Sorry to break it to you bit it works while socialism has completely failed.
There is nothing wrong with personal success, freedom and fulfilment - it is the glorification of the individual and the accompanying dimunition of the importance of the collective in our lives which fuels a selfish, violent and chaotic culture.
As for Socialism, well it was the system adopted by the UK government during its darkest hour when Britain was alone and without allies and the world's most powerful army and air force was camped 22 miles away waiting to invade. It helped organise industry so tanks, guns, food, resources, civil defence could be optimised for the benefit of the nation.
It was such a complete failure that after the war Clement Attlee managed to build 400,000 new council homes; created a universal free health service; created enough work for hundreds of thousands of demobbed troops, rebuilt British schools, and kick-started bankrupt British industry by nationalising it and pumping in millions in investment.
It's such a failure that Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark are among the most prosperous, socially cohesive, and happiest countries in the world.
Such a complete failure that it took billions and billions of dollars and a succession of brutal, repressive torturers to stamp it out in Latin America (and such a failure that the electorate saw fit to elect the Sandinistas in Nicaragua and left wing parties across South and Central America once the Contras had taken up new posts as drug smugglers, and the torturers were politely shuffled off into retirement).
Such a complete failure that both China and Russia used it to drag their war-devastated countries out of the stone age to Industrial superpower status in decades - despite both being invaded and occupied by the US.
Such a complete failure that the impoverished and war-ravaged Eastern European soviet satelites managed to provide full employment, cheap housing, subsidised fuel and transport, thriving arts and culture, sporting excellence, free healthcare and education for their citizens.
Now of course that's a pitiful substitute for such vital necessities such as the right to vote for candidates who both represent the business elite, or for the right to buy a pair of Nik e trainers with 'Capitalism wins' on the side I'll grant you....but in the end the good people of Eastern Europe did get to taste the joy of capitalism.
It 'worked' by destroying their jobs, their savings (whch became worthless overnight as the economy collapsed), putting tens of millions on welfare, and handing over national assets once owned by the collective to the Russian Mafia and the Oligarchs.
Still, it did create an exciting new job for the thousands of East German and Czech women who used to work in the now-closed textile factories. They were given the amazing opportunity to travel to the west, working in the world's biggest drive-in brothel - a whole town along the German/Czech border.
In the failed old days of Socialism they only got Fork*ed on shopping and polling days, now they get it everyday.
Hooray for good old Market forces capitalism - the system which was such a great success across the world that once again the banks collapsed and had to be bailed out by the good old tax payer.
How ironic that if Capitalist bankers had followed Friedman's strict policy of non-intervention and 'letting the markets decide', his cherished banks would have collapsed in ruins along with his tired old robber-baron ideology. It took a Socialist style nationalisation (politely called a bail-out to save embarrassment) to save the banks and the western economy.