- Joined
- Oct 11, 2006
- Messages
- 54,362
- Reaction score
- 87,174
Online
This could be what I've been waiting for since last month and I can't deep dive into this right now. But why bring in an ME or coroner for "items".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought it said remains...oof.
Such a weird case.
Found partial human remains?
This could be what I've been waiting for since last month and I can't deep dive into this right now. But why bring in an ME or coroner for "items".
Wouldn't shock me. I suspect he offed himself, then the animals went to work.In comments on YouTube, they are saying, animals might of eaten part of him. I have no idea.
Ultimately, I hoped he was still alive but I knew he wasn't. All these comparisons to Eric Rudolph but a rugged survivalist this kid wasn't. So if this is him and he did it weeks ago, yeah, no way the body is intact. I know all the channels I watch covering this are livestreaming now but I just can't tune in for all the minutiae.In comments on YouTube, they are saying, animals might of eaten part of him. I have no idea.
Yeah, it's a Zoom so I'm already sitting here and have to stop myself from just getting completely sidetracked.Time to reschedule a deposition? Good luck today!
From what I gather, popo found something, had the Laundries come in and attempt to identify it as belonging to Brian. And when they did confirm, then the ME showed up. FWIW, reports are that the Laundries left the park crying/in tears.Am I following this correctly? No developments at all, then all of the sudden his parents go back into the park and almost instantly find something belonging to Laundrie?
Yeaaaaahhhh.Am I following this correctly? No developments at all, then all of the sudden his parents go back into the park and almost instantly find something belonging to Laundrie?
I still think they could have dealt with this better at least regarding their contact with Gabby's parents AND been protected by an attorney. I understand completely the impetus to protect your own son, I don't understand just stonewalling the parents of the woman who was to be your daughter-in-law in an inhumane way.All obstruction and potential harboring claims aside, in a situation like this, you'd rather be Gabby's parents than Laundrie's, right?
I think both are dealing with the grief of losing a child, but I have to think the extra stigma that comes with your child being the murderer and the harassment you'll continue to suffer as a result of that would be worse. They basically have two killings on their conscience.I still think they could have dealt with this better at least regarding their contact with Gabby's parents AND been protected by an attorney. I understand completely the impetus to protect your own son, I don't understand just stonewalling the parents of the woman who was to be your daughter-in-law in an inhumane way.
Oh, but your question, no, I can't get onboard with that. They each will have grief they will have to find a way to live with, but Gabby's parents have to find a way to live with anger that won't consume them. But even if they do, to some extent it will take a toll. I'm sure John Walsh can help with that.
He doesn't seem like the 'off himself' type.Wouldn't shock me. I suspect he offed himself, then the animals went to work.
I get that. But they can always choose to "accept" the harassment. "Yes, we are terrible people for completely disrespecting Gabby's parents." Because they are.I think both are dealing with the grief of losing a child, but I have to think the extra stigma that comes with your child being the murderer and the harassment you'll continue to suffer as a result of that would be worse. They basically have two killings on their conscience.