- Moderator
- #46
Offline
You do know that slavery existed before the US was established, right?
You do know I was talking about American slavery right? It's right there in my post.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You do know that slavery existed before the US was established, right?
Not the way you initially wrote it. But I think that IF the root of the word is slavery period, folks wanted it gone. Ya dig? That's the gist of what I was getting at.The word master existed long before slaves were brought to America. So it didn't have it's roots in slavery.
You do know I was talking about American slavery right? It's right there in my post.
Again, the word is derived from magister in Latin and old English and has nothing at all to do with slavery. No more than a masters degree or a horse master or master helmsman or master chief or martial arts master or masters golf tournament or any other word with master in it, other than slave master.You do know that slavery existed before the US was established, right?
I get it and point out many more examples, master and apprentice, master and student, mastery of of language. I am ONLY saying that if Master's Quarters or master bedroom has a history in slavery, then it should be removed. That's my only point.Again, the word is derived from magister in Latin and old English and has nothing at all to do with slavery. No more than a masters degree or a horse master or master helmsman or master chief or martial arts master or masters golf tournament or any other word with master in it, other than slave master, does.
Not the way you initially wrote it. But I think that IF the root of the word is slavery period, folks wanted it gone. Ya dig? That's the gist of what I was getting at.
I get it and point out many more examples, master and apprentice, master and student, mastery of of language. I am ONLY saying that if Master's Quarters or master bedroom has a history in slavery, then it should be removed. That's my only point.
Let me ask this:
When you "master" a skill then what are you going to call it now?
Postmaster
Quartermaster
Masterpiece
Mastermind
Harbor master
Scout master
Masterful
Shopmaster
Webmaster
None of these words have anything at all to do with slavery.
I understand what you're getting at, but I dont know the source of the quoted part of your post. The word master existed long before slaves were brought to America. So it didn't have it's roots in slavery.
That said, I stated I don't really know where we are in terms of whether the word should be discontinued. If it should be, then by all means let's get rid of it. I just think we should make sure that's the right call. That's all I'm saying.
The quoted part was my attempt to paraphrase the way it's been explained to me. I think I did the general gist of it justice, but who knows. It's not something I have experience with, being a white man.
And I'm with you, I don't feel super strongly about this one particular instance. But it's just one of those things that removing the word removes zero value to society. I think a utilitarian approach is best for this one - greatest good for the greatest number of people.
How many people is keeping the word good for: zero
How many people is removing it good for: no idea, but it's more than zero.
Ergo, get rid of it.
I guess the question i have is whether there's a movement to get rid of it. Is it just one, or a few people raising it, or a significant number of them? I'm just curious because I hadn't heard of this before this thread.
Master of the house is not "rooted" in slavery as I've repeatedly pointed out.That's why nobody is calling for the words in your list to be renamed. Master has multiple definitions. "Master" as in to perfect a craft has no roots in slavery. "Master" as in the master of the house and the master bedroom (vs. the servants' quarters) has roots in slavery.
Master of the house is not "rooted" in slavery as I've repeatedly pointed out.
Once again, you're completely ignoring easily verifiable information to make your case. Are you ever going to answer me about which state university you were referring to?I'm aware that you believe that you've pointed that out.