Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So does this new cap apply to people who have a bundle package (internet and cable)?
My thoughts (apropos of nothing in particular):
It's been coming for a while. The higher speed you subscribe to, the higher your cap. With everyone cutting the cable and going to streaming, it was kind of inevitable.
Presumably, the highest speed would have a somewhat unreachable cap, although I know there are some consumers of data here that will blow away any limits that might be around.
Personally, I have a fairly high tier of Cox services (I get about 150Mb) and I didn't get the email or a letter, but I also go nowhere near my caps (still stream a good bit, but also have DTV).
There's obviously a money-grab component here to compensate for those trading cable tv for internet service, but by the same token, it's reasonable to hold those accountable for their higher bandwidth usage and associated strain on the system. However, I do think with the prevalence of the internet and the ridiculous lobbying of those providers, that ISPs should be regulated like a utility. It's hard to argue that access to the internet isn't a basic requirement of society these days, at the very least equivalent to phone service when it became a utility.
That's because 50 of those channels you never watched.I just started Sling tv, and I pay $25/month for about 30 channels, but it's much better than the $80+ I was paying DTV.
That's because 50 of those channels you never watched.
Yes, it's related to whatever tier of internet you subscribe to.
I just started Sling tv, and I pay $25/month for about 30 channels, but it's much better than the $80+ I was paying DTV.
I heard them saying on the WWL radio news this morning that Cox said their cap is going to be a TB/month and that 95% of their customers never reach that amount.
Is this totally false? I would be switching to them if the TB/month is true.
I have Uverse right now packaged with Directv but was planning on switching to Cox and Slingtv in the next month or two. I'm going to lose my uncapped Uverse when I cancel Directv so planned to go to Cox, but if the cap is going to be just as low as Uverse, why would I bother switching?
My thoughts (apropos of nothing in particular):
It's been coming for a while. The higher speed you subscribe to, the higher your cap. With everyone cutting the cable and going to streaming, it was kind of inevitable.
Presumably, the highest speed would have a somewhat unreachable cap, although I know there are some consumers of data here that will blow away any limits that might be around.
Personally, I have a fairly high tier of Cox services (I get about 150Mb) and I didn't get the email or a letter, but I also go nowhere near my caps (still stream a good bit, but also have DTV).
There's obviously a money-grab component here to compensate for those trading cable tv for internet service, but by the same token, it's reasonable to hold those accountable for their higher bandwidth usage and associated strain on the system. However, I do think with the prevalence of the internet and the ridiculous lobbying of those providers, that ISPs should be regulated like a utility. It's hard to argue that access to the internet isn't a basic requirement of society these days, at the very least equivalent to phone service when it became a utility.
I used to install for Cox in Pensacola/Fort Walton. I had an install within the last year where the customer was reinstalling all of his cable boxes after having gone down to internet only. He went back to cable because he said that it was costing him more money to stream PSVue in all rooms than it was to have a cable box in every room.Well with everything going 4K in a couple of years that GB usage could be hitting that $10 fine with some people. Seems like the cable industry is saying fine want to cancel us and our ugly boxes and go to streaming then we will find another way to make money off of you. Just my thought.
I used to install for Cox in Pensacola/Fort Walton. I had an install within the last year where the customer was reinstalling all of his cable boxes after having gone down to internet only. He went back to cable because he said that it was costing him more money to stream PSVue in all rooms than it was to have a cable box in every room.
It's all ********.