Article Exploring How the Saints Could Trade Up for Cam Ward

You could do some research yourself... first search hit I got was an ESPN article from 2021, listing them all to that point in time (according to them).

Between 2000 and 2021, 1st round, top 1-10 picks:

Josh Rosen 10th overall - bust
Mitchell Trubisky 2nd overall - bust
Robert Griffin III 2nd overall (who wasn't a bust really, he got hurt, but still...)
Sam Darnold 3rd overall - bust for the Jets/Panthers/9ers (we'll see with the Seahawks)
Jared Goff 1st overall - Rams/Lions teams so good, they won a lot of games even with him at QB
Trey Lance 3rd overall - bust for the 9ers, on his 3rd team.
Carson Wentz 2nd overall - bust
Blaine Gabbert 10th overall - bust
Mark Sanchez 5th overall - el busto supremo
Michael Vick 1st overall - was doing well, until...

1st round:

Tim Tebow
Kyle Boller
DeShaun Watson
Paxton Lynch
Johnny Manziel
Teddy Bridgewater
Paxton Lynch
Josh Freeman
Brady Quinn
Jay Cutler
Jason Campbell
J.P. Lossman

Before 2000, not pretty either... you got Ryan Leaf, Jeff George, Steve Fuller... Steve Bartkowski...

The only 4 successful QBs that have been part of a draft day trade for a pick in the draft are Josh Allen ( 7th overall, no SB yet), Jordan Love (26th overall, 1 season, got to see more), Lamar Jackson ( 32nd overall, regular season MVP, irrelevant in the playoffs), and Mahomes.
And it gets even uglier when you get out of the first round. Fox Sports ran the numbers already. Until find your franchise QB you need to keep drafting one because the QB purgatory we've been stuck in sucks. Not good enough to win a playoff game but not bad enough to land a top 3 picks.

We're also not talking about letting Dennis Allen trade up to #1 overall to find his QB. We're talking about a brilliant offensive mind and former QB trading up. If he thinks Ward is worth it then chances are he's worth it. Most QB's bust because they are going to a system that doesn't fit them or they aren't mature enough to handle it. We don't have to worry about the system with Moore and they're doing their HW to figure out the maturity question but that's supposed to be a positive with him.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250324-173125.png
    Screenshot_20250324-173125.png
    168.3 KB · Views: 1
You could do some research yourself... first search hit I got was an ESPN article from 2021, listing them all to that point in time (according to them).

Between 2000 and 2021, 1st round, top 1-10 picks:

Josh Rosen 10th overall - bust
Mitchell Trubisky 2nd overall - bust
Robert Griffin III 2nd overall (who wasn't a bust really, he got hurt, but still...)
Sam Darnold 3rd overall - bust for the Jets/Panthers/9ers (we'll see with the Seahawks)
Jared Goff 1st overall - Rams/Lions teams so good, they won a lot of games even with him at QB
Trey Lance 3rd overall - bust for the 9ers, on his 3rd team.
Carson Wentz 2nd overall - bust
Blaine Gabbert 10th overall - bust
Mark Sanchez 5th overall - el busto supremo
Michael Vick 1st overall - was doing well, until...

1st round:

Tim Tebow
Kyle Boller
DeShaun Watson
Paxton Lynch
Johnny Manziel
Teddy Bridgewater
Paxton Lynch
Josh Freeman
Brady Quinn
Jay Cutler
Jason Campbell
J.P. Lossman

Before 2000, not pretty either... you got Ryan Leaf, Jeff George, Steve Fuller... Steve Bartkowski...

The only 4 successful QBs that have been part of a draft day trade for a pick in the draft are Josh Allen ( 7th overall, no SB yet), Jordan Love (26th overall, 1 season, got to see more), Lamar Jackson ( 32nd overall, regular season MVP, irrelevant in the playoffs), and Mahomes.
this site lists the 1st rounders over the past 15 years: https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/...years-from-justin-fields-to-mark-sanchez/amp/

There have been 46 1st rounders. Of that group 15% were “home runs”, 6% were “solid”, with the rest being anywhere from “mixed results” to “busts”. So that is less than a 25% chance of one truly panning out. So your data on trade ups isn’t surprising considering the overall numbers. When looking at the “home run” and “solid” groups, here are the number per draft position:

#1- lllll
#5- l
#6- l
#7- l
#12- l
#32- l

So, eight of the eleven were top 10 picks. Five of the eleven were #1 overall. The probability of a “home run” and “solid” QB from a #1 overall pick is 5 out of 10 (50%). And the lists of disappointments included Bradford who wasn’t bad but career was derailed by injury, Winston who has managed to stay in the league a long time, Darnold who is a starting QB, Mayfield who is a starting QB, and Goff who is a starting QB. Certainly better odds than a random 1st rounder. And when you are looking beyond the 1st round, you might as well be playing lotto.

So, I think you’re looking at it wrong. Look at the players selected #1, which is where Ward is likely to be selected. You’ll see that it’s definitely the highest likelihood of returns. You have to play to win. Right now, Carr/Rattler is a losing hand. I’m not sure that Ward is a winning hand, but certainly the odds are better than Carr/Rattler, and better than anything we would have at #9.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: RJS
Reminds me a little of donovan mcnabb.
We shouldn’t be having this insane conversation on this forum of whether we should pursue Ward. Of course we should be pursuing Ward. The question is whether we should be wasting our time discussing Ward because the Titans would be nuts for trading him away.
 
sorry but Ward isnt some kind of generational talent that they should give up so much for, thats alot of potential cheap starters at alot of positions..
And none of it means anything without a franchise QB.

The question shouldn't be if we're trading up for a QB but when. If it doesn't happen this year then it's happening next year.
 
this site lists the 1st rounders over the past 15 years: https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/...years-from-justin-fields-to-mark-sanchez/amp/

There have been 46 1st rounders. Of that group 15% were “home runs”, 6% were “solid”, with the rest being anywhere from “mixed results” to “busts”. So that is less than a 25% chance of one truly panning out. So your data on trade ups isn’t surprising considering the overall numbers. When looking at the “home run” and “solid” groups, here are the number per draft position:

#1- lllll
#5- l
#6- l
#7- l
#12- l
#32- l

So, eight of the eleven were top 10 picks. Five of the eleven were #1 overall. The probability of a “home run” and “solid” QB from a #1 overall pick is 5 out of 10 (50%). And the lists of disappointments included Bradford who wasn’t bad but career was derailed by injury, Winston who has managed to stay in the league a long time, Darnold who is a starting QB, Mayfield who is a starting QB, and Goff who is a starting QB. Certainly better odds than a random 1st rounder. And when you are looking beyond the 1st round, you might as well be playing lotto.

So, I think you’re looking at it wrong. Look at the players selected #1, which is where Ward is likely to be selected. You’ll see that it’s definitely the highest likelihood of returns. You have to play to win. Right now, Carr/Rattler is a losing hand. I’m not sure that Ward is a winning hand, but certainly the odds are better than Carr/Rattler, and better than anything we would have at #9.

There goes the goal post.

I am looking at it from the thread title, i.e., trading up for a QB, not just picking a QB, but trading up for a QB, and the numbers on trading up for a QB speak for themselves.

Darnold is on his 5th team. He had 1 good year last year. That's it.
Winston is on his 4th team.
Mayfield is on his 3rd team.
Goff is on his 2nd.

... i.e., they did not work out for the team that drafted them.
 
There goes the goal post.

I am looking at it from the thread title, i.e., trading up for a QB, not just picking a QB, but trading up for a QB, and the numbers on trading up for a QB speak for themselves.

Darnold is on his 5th team. He had 1 good year last year. That's it.
Winston is on his 4th team.
Mayfield is on his 3rd team.
Goff is on his 2nd.

... i.e., they did not work out for the team that drafted them.
Does trading up magically make the player worse? I’m sorry but that doesn’t make sense. It’s far more likely that most trade-ups don’t involve the #1 pick. And as you can see above…there isn’t a 100% hit rate, but the rate is never going to be 100% for any pick. Heck…look at our recent history of 1st rounders. And the upside (and relative hit rate) is high…as I’ve pointed out.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom