fiz
Guest
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2004
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 3
Offline
Taysom Hill is 1 of 1 you don't just go out and find a backup of him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mahommes is 1 of 1, Brees was 1 of 1, Brady was 1 of 1, yet they all had backups. Backups are backups because they can't aren't as talented as the people they are backing up. No backup can do everything as well as the person they are backing up can do things.Taysom Hill is 1 of 1 you don't just go out and find a backup of him
It's a little different in Taysom's case. It's not just what he physically does out on the field (there's nobody else that can throw, run, catch, AND block at the levels that TH can) it's also what he knows. He knows the assignments for EVERY skill position. That's why he's literally 1 of 1...like, ever.Mahommes is 1 of 1, Brees was 1 of 1, Brady was 1 of 1, yet they all had backups. Backups are backups because they can't aren't as talented as the people they are backing up. No backup can do everything as well as the person they are backing up can do things.
There's no one known right now that is a good as Hill at everything he's good at, but there are some who are good enough as a backup plan.
It takes multiple players to back him up and we didn't have those players.It's a little different in Taysom's case. It's not just what he physically does out on the field (there's nobody else that can throw, run, catch, AND block at the levels that TH can) it's also what he knows. He knows the assignments for EVERY skill position. That's why he's literally 1 of 1...like, ever.
Taysom IS the backup at QB, RB, FB, TE, and receiver. He doesn't have a backup, and he never will. Because of what he can do, and because of what he knows, he can be lined up anywhere to create a favorable matchup or serve as a decoy because he's explosive with the ball in his hands. When he's done, we'll likely never see anyone like him again.
I don't think anyone is thinking that way. He has a torn ACL and is 35. I'm not sure what benefit he offers to the team in the future, but he certainly doesn't have another 55 TDs in him. But he's a legendary Saint.By all means, kick him to the curb, we have more than enough offensive weapons.
How many times do I have to say that backups are not as good as the players they are backing up? There are other players who can pass, run and catch too. They just can't do it at the same level. That's why they would be a backup.It's a little different in Taysom's case. It's not just what he physically does out on the field (there's nobody else that can throw, run, catch, AND block at the levels that TH can) it's also what he knows. He knows the assignments for EVERY skill position. That's why he's literally 1 of 1...like, ever.
He's not the backup QB. The Saints started two rookies who both struggled without starting Hill at QB when he was healthy.Taysom IS the backup at QB, RB, FB, TE, and receiver.
He doesn't, but he can. No backup is as good as the person they are backing up. This seems to stem from the "I want all pro quality backups at every spot" mentality. It's a Madden/fantasy football pipe dream. No team had all pro offensive or defensive players playing second string offense or defense.He doesn't have a backup, and he never will.
It doesn't have to take multiple players. There are a lot of athletic QB's that can't cut it as a starting QB, but they can pass, run, catch and block good enough to back up Hill.It takes multiple players to back him up and we didn't have those players.
Taysom doesn’t start at any offensive position, but he's on the depth chart for every skill position. That includes QB, where he lined up dozens of times, took the snap from center, handed the ball off, kept the ball as a rusher, dropped back to throw, and actually threw passes to receivers. He IS the ultimate backup, and he cannot be backed up by one player. If that player existed, capable of doing everything he does at the NFL level, every team would have their own version of him.How many times do I have to say that backups are not as good as the players they are backing up? There are other players who can pass, run and catch too. They just can't do it at the same level. That's why they would be a backup.
He's not the backup QB. The Saints started two rookies who both struggled without starting Hill at QB when he was healthy.
He doesn't, but he can. No backup is as good as the person they are backing up. This seems to stem from the "I want all pro quality backups at every spot" mentality. It's a Madden/fantasy football pipe dream. No team had all pro offensive or defensive players playing second string offense or defense.
You're using the logical fallacy of "ad ignorantiam"/"argument from ignorance." The lack of evidence of something does not prove it to be false.If that player existed, capable of doing everything he does at the NFL level, every team would have their own version of him.
Exactly, I think TH will take a pay cut and he staysI think the team may reach out to Hill about renegotiating that $10m base salary. They could guarantee a portion of it and replace some of the dollars with incentives so he can earn it back if he returns healthy. It would be a win for both sides, as Hill is unlikely to have a big market in free agency due to his age and injury.
The bold part is the mistake the Saints made with Hill and it would be a mistake with any starter.
Shaheed has missed a lot of games with injuries, does that mean it's a mistake to rely on Shaheed in the offense? No, it's not. You rely on him when he can play and have a backup plan that keeps the offense from dropping off a lot.
Olave has missed a lot of games with injuries, does that mean it's a mistake to rely on Olave in the offense? No, it's not. You rely on him when he can play and have a backup plan that keeps the offense from dropping off a lot.
Kamara has missed a lot of games and has played hobbled in others due to injuries, does that mean it's a mistake to rely on Kamara in the offense? No, it's not. You rely on him when he can play and have a backup plan that keeps the offense from dropping off a lot.
The same is true of Hill. It is not a problem to rely on Hill in the offense. The problem is not having any backup plan at all for when he's out. I wouldn't be surprised to see the Saints under Moore draft or sign the best possible backup for Hill. As is true with all backups, Hill's backup wouldn't be as good as Hill, but he'd be better than no backup at all.
Father Time is absolutely undefeated. But he's losing ground a little bit. Players take such good care of themselves these days. QB's can play into their 40's, RB's can play into their 30's. We are trotting out a 36 year old MLB for pete's sack. That said, Taysom is one of those types of players that I would bank on being able to extend his career beyond what most 35 year olds are capable of. Hope so at least.Your missing the most important point.....TH is 35, those guys are all in their 20's, with AK turning 30 before next season....
Father time wins all battles, and this is assuming that TH will be back this season.....he may retire or the Saints may release him.....I honestly hope (if healthy) they can bring him back at a reduced rate....
Also, I love TH, and wish he were in his 20's or even 30, but I feel his time with the Saints is coming to a close.....