- Moderator
- #1,021
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2002
- Messages
- 36,614
- Reaction score
- 46,859
- Age
- 49
Offline
Ugh. Thanks for catching that.Excellent autocorrect.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ugh. Thanks for catching that.Excellent autocorrect.
“There is no doubt there was a terrible, terrible, awful wrong done,” Boggs said.
But he asked the jurors to confront their definitions of justice as they weighed whether to convict the teenager of second-degree murder, which carries a mandatory life-in-prison sentence. Boggs argued Honore had been failed by his parents.
“I am going to come to you and say, let’s not throw away another life,” he said.
Which might make some feel good even though it does nothing to help the issue or prevent the next one"I am going to come to you and say, let's not throw away another life" and as a juror, I'd say, "Too bad, too sad, you're going to prison."
What if he goes out and does it again? I would not feel too good about that either. I mean, I'm with you though. I don't know how you prevent the next one though.Which might make some feel good even though it does nothing to help the issue or prevent the next one
No, it doesn't help or prevent, but there's no way he should be allowed a free pass because he had a tough life. Society is just messed up on so many levels and it's sad.Which might make some feel good even though it does nothing to help the issue or prevent the next one
Isn’t this the opposite but same argument as “affluencey” that the kid in Texas used?No, it doesn't help or prevent, but there's no way he should be allowed a free pass because he had a tough life. Society is just messed up on so many levels and it's sad.
Except that one side has decades of data supporting itIsn’t this the opposite but same argument as “affluencey” that the kid in Texas used?
Which might make some feel good even though it does nothing to help the issue or prevent the next one
Deterrence is not the only purpose of punishment under the law. There's also a matter ofjusticerevenge.
to your point-->Deterrence is not the only purpose of punishment under the law. There's also a matter of justice. The latter demands a very, very harsh penalty in this case.
What do think would 'help the issue' going forward?
Derbes, who prosecuted the case with Assistant District Attorney Forrest Ladd, argued the jury's decision was simple.
“It goes without saying that … this probably would not have happened had he have had a better upbringing. And yes, those are awful, awful things. But it does not change the law.”
aside from the rare chemical imbalance, most data is fairly clear that systemic dynamics are primary factors in crime (and especially in sentencing/punishment)Deterrence is not the only purpose of punishment under the law. There's also a matter of justice. The latter demands a very, very harsh penalty in this case.
What do think would 'help the issue' going forward?