Just another day in New Orleans (4 Viewers)

Trial is underway and the defense strategy is to ask for mercy because the defendant wasn't raised right.

“There is no doubt there was a terrible, terrible, awful wrong done,” Boggs said.
But he asked the jurors to confront their definitions of justice as they weighed whether to convict the teenager of second-degree murder, which carries a mandatory life-in-prison sentence. Boggs argued Honore had been failed by his parents.


“I am going to come to you and say, let’s not throw away another life,” he said.

 
"I am going to come to you and say, let's not throw away another life" and as a juror, I'd say, "Too bad, too sad, you're going to prison."
 
Which might make some feel good even though it does nothing to help the issue or prevent the next one
What if he goes out and does it again? I would not feel too good about that either. I mean, I'm with you though. I don't know how you prevent the next one though.
 
Which might make some feel good even though it does nothing to help the issue or prevent the next one
No, it doesn't help or prevent, but there's no way he should be allowed a free pass because he had a tough life. Society is just messed up on so many levels and it's sad.
 
No, it doesn't help or prevent, but there's no way he should be allowed a free pass because he had a tough life. Society is just messed up on so many levels and it's sad.
Isn’t this the opposite but same argument as “affluencey” that the kid in Texas used?
 
Which might make some feel good even though it does nothing to help the issue or prevent the next one

Deterrence is not the only purpose of punishment under the law. There's also a matter of justice. The latter demands a very, very harsh penalty in this case.

What do think would 'help the issue' going forward?
 
Deterrence is not the only purpose of punishment under the law. There's also a matter of justice. The latter demands a very, very harsh penalty in this case.

What do think would 'help the issue' going forward?
to your point-->

Derbes, who prosecuted the case with Assistant District Attorney Forrest Ladd, argued the jury's decision was simple.

“It goes without saying that … this probably would not have happened had he have had a better upbringing. And yes, those are awful, awful things. But it does not change the law.”
 
Deterrence is not the only purpose of punishment under the law. There's also a matter of justice. The latter demands a very, very harsh penalty in this case.

What do think would 'help the issue' going forward?
aside from the rare chemical imbalance, most data is fairly clear that systemic dynamics are primary factors in crime (and especially in sentencing/punishment)
just punishing while being blithe to political/systemic factors that at least contributed (if not being the driving factor) to the crimes, just perpetuates the ****** up dynamics

yes, removed the dude from society, BUT work to make sure the likliehood of the 'next' crime lessens
 
@brandon8283

Please don't quote someone and edit their quote for 2 reasons. One, it's not appropriate and two, if someone wants to relpy to your post, nothing is quoted, and people can't quote your post when responding.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom