- Banned
- #46
Flipx99
Thanks MJ!
- Joined
- May 5, 2008
- Messages
- 15,375
- Reaction score
- 15,708
Offline
It wasn't a great response, but it wasn't nearly as bad as you portray. She openly admits this is a long process and doesn't just happen over night.
Can you even imagine fearing to call the police because they will likely escalate a situation and make things worse? Because, that's essentially what is happening and what these reforms are seeking to end.
According to her, she has been asked the very reasonable question of, "who do I call when my home is being broken into" many times, and yet she still doesn't have a legitimate answer. She admits that instead of providing anything that resembles a viable solution, she tries to shame her constituents by telling them that the question itself is the result of "privilege."
This thread is filled with intelligent people, and I have not seen anyone present even an idea (let alone try to address the details) of how to proceed after the police force has been dismantled.
To come out during the middle of a civil crisis and send the message the city is going to get rid of the police and not have the slightest idea of how that those functions will be taken care of afterward is just silly.
It sounds like a group project in a resentment studies course.