- Moderator
- #91
Offline
15 yards and a 1st down. Wow.
Most of these tackles are 1st down anyways, but what if you're trying to wrap up a QB and they basically dragged themselves forward while falling?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
15 yards and a 1st down. Wow.
Most of these tackles are 1st down anyways, but what if you're trying to wrap up a QB and they basically dragged themselves forward while falling?
Cut blocking can be hazardous to knees for sure, but I would argue that cut blocking happens a lot more frequently than hip drop tackles, making hip drop tackles more hazardous per event than cut blocking.I would bet that there are more non-contact injuries than "hip drop" injuries. I can't count the times I have seen someone get a season-ending knee injury from cutting and even a few from celebrating.
All these crap rules are for is more NFL control of winners and losers.
True, bad officiating is bad officiating, fixing that would solve many other rule issues.As others have alluded to, it’s not the rule that’s going to be bad, it’s the inconsistent enforcement of it that we’re surely about to witness.
That definitely helps. I imagine there will be people foaming at the mouth waiting for the first time the penalty is incorrectly called though (which is bound to happen).
I'm not one to complain about taking dangerous things out of the game or taking the violence out of football, but if the below is an example of something that is a clear violation of the new rule, I'm not sure how you tackle anymore. I mean, yes he landed on the guy's legs, but that's going to happen when you tackle someone to the ground and are trying to hit a moving target. There was no attempt to put full weight on the guy's legs and he wrapped up and brought him down on a bang bang play. It's not like he jumped on top of him and brought him down by putting weight and stress on the guy's knees.
I honestly don't under stand how this is a "hip drop tackle." He hit him in the hips and brought him down. I thought we wanted them to do this to avoid helmet to helmet contact? And the alternative to this kind of tackle is to hit high which is exactly what they wanted them to stop doing up until now. If you can't hit high and you can't hit low, what are you supposed to do? And this looks like a hit in the middle that results in landing on the guy's legs which is now a foul.
You can still hit them low. Even wrap their legs up. The rule is you can’t drop the weight of your body onto their lower legs (below knee) and trap their legs under you. I think the wording of the rule needs to be cleaned up and clarified but I don’t have a problem with this particular tackle being removed from the game.If thats a foul the NFL has now become unwatchable, how you stop someone that can pull a car with a rope tied to their waste, if you cant use your weight to stop their momentum their just going carry you to the endzone, or you have to slow them down until your teamates stand infront of which would be like 15 to 20 yds anyway. At this point it should be 30 yrd firstdowns
NFL competition committee proposes a ban on hip-drop tackles and a radical change to kickoffs
The NFL competition committee is proposing a rule to penalize so-called “hip-drop” tackles and a radical change to kickoffs to add more returns without compromising safety.apnews.com
I for the life of me cannot seem to fathom why they’d want to ban that. Why do they insist on ruining their product? How are players supposed to tackle on offense. This is getting old. Really old…..
If this gets through…I’m done. No more NFL. I can’t take this non sense anymore. It’s football. It’s a contact sport.
What are your thoughts?