- Moderator
- #286
Offline
Could you expand on what you do mean by "along with the encyclopedia"?
Lol, tempting fate methinks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could you expand on what you do mean by "along with the encyclopedia"?
Lol, tempting fate methinks.
David m. I would like to have you read Daniel about the king of the north and south along with the encyclopedia. It's like Daniel was writing the encyclopedia. This was while he was living in the Babylonian empire. That was before the medio Persian empire which was before Alexander the greats death which was when his 4 generals scrambled to take over and see that Bible prophecy is real.
Sounds like you have some serious anxiety issues and are actually reaching out to us instead.
David m. I would like to have you read Daniel about the king of the north and south along with the encyclopedia. It's like Daniel was writing the encyclopedia. This was while he was living in the Babylonian empire. That was before the medio Persian empire which was before Alexander the greats death which was when his 4 generals scrambled to take over and see that Bible prophecy is real.
What are they teaching at Ole Miss?
What are they teaching at Ole Miss?
This is a lie. There isn’t any eloquent way to put it. This is the same lie paraded by the History Channel and several other secular platforms. It just simply is not true.
It’s not a lie. That the Gospels are not eyewitnesses and copy from each other is well documented, mainstream biblical scholarship. That most of the epistles are forgeries is mainstream biblical scholarship. That the figures and stories of the OT are non-historical mythology is mainstream biblical scholarship.
There isn’t any eloquent way to put it, but Christianity is just as made-up as every other religion.
It isn’t mainstream biblical scholarship. You’re simply parading untruths as fact.
The spirit of Feo on SR is alive and hacking peeps accounts.
Provided are three books available here in the links below to read online for free by three mainstream biblical scholars discussing each of the three issues in my statements just above. I'm not a liar, and don't really appreciate being called one, but I am willing to believe you were simply ignorant of these issues. And you don't have to agree with their conclusions, I just want to show you that I am not making shirt up and that these are indeed well known issues of mainstream biblical scholarship.
First up - The Synoptic Problem by Mark Goodacre, a Professor at Duke University's Department of Religion. This discusses how the Gospels copy from each other, a well known fact among Biblical studies (aka "the synoptic problem").
https://archive.org/details/synopticproblemw00good
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Goodacre
Second - Forged by Bart Ehrman, the Professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina. I'm not too much of a fan of Ehrman, as I think he's kind of dogmatic about sticking to the mainstream consensus, but this book is worth reading, providing a survey of which books are not believed to have been written by whom they claim to be and why.
https://archive.org/details/BartD.Ehrman-ForgedWritingInTheNameOfGod-WhyTheBiblesAuthors
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bart_D._Ehrman
Finally - The Mythic Past by Thomas L. Thompson, former longtime Professor of Theology at the University of Copenhagen, and also probably one of the most important biblical scholars of the last fifty years. This book discusses how evidence leads to conclusions that the stories of the OT are based in literary myth as opposed to being historical.
https://archive.org/details/TheMythicPastBiblicalArchaeologyAndTheMythOfIsrael
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_L._Thompson