- Joined
- Aug 6, 2011
- Messages
- 40,334
- Reaction score
- 64,841
- Age
- 39
Offline
SF is a great example of it, and it’s more of a money ball approach, which given our roster situation (older and underperforming), it makes sense.I think that sounds smarter on paper, at least. But, I've just never seen it work out anywhere. Maybe SF?
Don’t put all your eggs in the quarterback basket. Pay mid tier money for a mid tier quarterback, draft smart, have every spot managed by a slightly above average to good/great player.